Urine toxicology screening by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry in a quaternary hospital setting

Jeffrey D. Pope, Marion J. Black, Olaf H. Drummer, Hans G. Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Validation of a non-targeted method for urine drug screening (UDS) by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF), and comparison to an established GC–MS method in a hospital setting. Methods: 217 UDS specimens sent to a quaternary hospital pathology department, were analysed by a CEDIA® immunoassay screen (six drug panels; amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine metabolites, cannabinoids and opiates) on an Abbott Architect instrument. Specimens were subsequently analysed by an established non-targeted qualitative GC–MS method and results compared with a general unknown screening method by LC-QTOF that was under evaluation as a replacement method. Results: 42 selected drugs were evaluated; limits of identification ranged from 2 to 100 µg/L and most drugs (n = 39) were stabile for 24 h after preparation. Matrix effects greater than 25% were observed in seven of the selected drugs. 87% of the specimens tested positive to 1 or more drug panels in a CEDIA® screen. A total of 537 positive drug findings were identified by GC–MS compared to 1,267 positive findings by LC-QTOF. On average, each GC–MS screen identified 2.5 ± 1.8 drugs and the LC-QTOF screen identified 5.8 ± 3.2 drugs. No drugs were identified in 11.3% of the GC–MS screens, whereas drugs were detected in 99% of these by the LC-QTOF. In almost all instances, the LC-QTOF screen could provide mass spectrometric confirmatory results of positive immunoassay screens and was able to identify a wider range of additional drugs and drug metabolites. Conclusions: The described general unknown screening (non-targeted, qualitative) LC-QTOF method can detect a larger range of drugs encountered in a hospital setting. The method has been shown to be suitable for comprehensive toxicology screening in a clinical toxicology laboratory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-72
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Biochemistry
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Keywords

  • Bioanalysis
  • Clinical toxicology
  • High resolution mass spectrometry
  • Time of flight
  • Urine drug screen

Cite this