Uranium scavenging during mineral replacement reactions

Kan Li, Allan Pring, Barbara Etschmann, Edeltraud MacMillan, Yung Ngothai, Brian O'Neill, Antony Hooker, Fred Mosselmans, Joel Brugger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interface coupled dissolution-reprecipitation reactions (ICDR) are a common feature of fluid-rock interaction during crustal fluid flow. We tested the hypothesis that ICDR reactions can play a key role in scavenging minor elements by exploring the fate of U during the experimental sulfidation of hematite to chalcopyrite under hydrothermal conditions (220-300 °C). The experiments where U was added, either as solid UO2+x(s) or as a soluble uranyl complex, differed from the U-free experiments in that pyrite precipitated initially, before the onset of chalcopyrite precipitation. In addition, in UO2+x(s)- bearing experiments, enhanced hematite dissolution led to increased porosity and precipitation of pyrite+magnetite within the hematite core, whereas in uranyl nitrate-bearing experiments, abundant pyrite formed initially, before being replaced by chalcopyrite. Uranium scavenging was mainly associated with the early reaction stage (pyrite precipitation), resulting in a thin U-rich line marking the original hematite grain surface. This "line" consists of nanocrystals of UO2+x(s), based on chemical mapping and XANES spectroscopy. This study shows that the presence of minor components can affect the pathway of ICDR reactions. Reactions between U- and Cu-bearing fluids and hematite can explain the Cu-U association prominent in some iron oxide-copper-gold (IOCG) deposits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1728-1735
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Mineralogist
Volume100
Issue number8-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Experiment
  • Interface coupled dissolution-reprecipitation reactions
  • IOCG deposits
  • Scavenging
  • Sulfidation reaction
  • Uranium

Cite this