Uptake of the Victorian Government school and early childhood service health promotion framework in the City of Greater Geelong according to area-level socioeconomic position

Ruby Brooks, Kathryn Backholer, Alexandra Chung, Claire Palermo, Chad Foulkes, Carly Monaghan, Anna Peeters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Issue addressed: Whole-of-setting initiatives have been recommended as an equitable approach to health promotion. However, there has been little analysis of differences in uptake of such approaches according to indicators of socioeconomic position. In Victoria, Australia, the Achievement Program is a state government health promotion initiative that uses a whole-of-setting approach in early childhood services, schools and workplaces. We conducted an exploratory comparison of uptake of and progression through the programme by schools and early childhood services in one local area, according to area-level socioeconomic position. Methods: Approximately 3 years after programme initiation, we linked data on the progress of 89 early childhood services and 67 primary schools to an area-level index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage. We compared uptake of and progression through the programme by setting (service or school) and quartiles of socioeconomic position. Results: About 89% of early childhood services and 70% of primary schools had registered for the programme, with 18% and 15%, respectively, attaining the goal of completing the final stage. A greater proportion of settings in areas in the most disadvantaged quartile had registered for the programme and completed the final stage of the programme, compared with settings in areas in the least disadvantaged quartile. However, variation by socioeconomic position was not linear across quartiles. Conclusion: The Achievement Program did not appear to be inequitable in its uptake. Research into uptake in other local areas and outcomes achieved would be beneficial. So what?: This demonstrates that whole-of-setting approaches can potentially be an equity-enhancing approach to health promotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-280
Number of pages5
JournalHealth Promotion Journal of Australia
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • children
  • health equity
  • health promoting schools

Cite this

@article{eb14b05618f84b67aeee350729e136b3,
title = "Uptake of the Victorian Government school and early childhood service health promotion framework in the City of Greater Geelong according to area-level socioeconomic position",
abstract = "Issue addressed: Whole-of-setting initiatives have been recommended as an equitable approach to health promotion. However, there has been little analysis of differences in uptake of such approaches according to indicators of socioeconomic position. In Victoria, Australia, the Achievement Program is a state government health promotion initiative that uses a whole-of-setting approach in early childhood services, schools and workplaces. We conducted an exploratory comparison of uptake of and progression through the programme by schools and early childhood services in one local area, according to area-level socioeconomic position. Methods: Approximately 3 years after programme initiation, we linked data on the progress of 89 early childhood services and 67 primary schools to an area-level index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage. We compared uptake of and progression through the programme by setting (service or school) and quartiles of socioeconomic position. Results: About 89{\%} of early childhood services and 70{\%} of primary schools had registered for the programme, with 18{\%} and 15{\%}, respectively, attaining the goal of completing the final stage. A greater proportion of settings in areas in the most disadvantaged quartile had registered for the programme and completed the final stage of the programme, compared with settings in areas in the least disadvantaged quartile. However, variation by socioeconomic position was not linear across quartiles. Conclusion: The Achievement Program did not appear to be inequitable in its uptake. Research into uptake in other local areas and outcomes achieved would be beneficial. So what?: This demonstrates that whole-of-setting approaches can potentially be an equity-enhancing approach to health promotion.",
keywords = "children, health equity, health promoting schools",
author = "Ruby Brooks and Kathryn Backholer and Alexandra Chung and Claire Palermo and Chad Foulkes and Carly Monaghan and Anna Peeters",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hpja.45",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "276--280",
journal = "Health Promotion Journal of Australia",
issn = "1036-1073",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "2",

}

Uptake of the Victorian Government school and early childhood service health promotion framework in the City of Greater Geelong according to area-level socioeconomic position. / Brooks, Ruby; Backholer, Kathryn; Chung, Alexandra; Palermo, Claire; Foulkes, Chad; Monaghan, Carly; Peeters, Anna.

In: Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 276-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uptake of the Victorian Government school and early childhood service health promotion framework in the City of Greater Geelong according to area-level socioeconomic position

AU - Brooks, Ruby

AU - Backholer, Kathryn

AU - Chung, Alexandra

AU - Palermo, Claire

AU - Foulkes, Chad

AU - Monaghan, Carly

AU - Peeters, Anna

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Issue addressed: Whole-of-setting initiatives have been recommended as an equitable approach to health promotion. However, there has been little analysis of differences in uptake of such approaches according to indicators of socioeconomic position. In Victoria, Australia, the Achievement Program is a state government health promotion initiative that uses a whole-of-setting approach in early childhood services, schools and workplaces. We conducted an exploratory comparison of uptake of and progression through the programme by schools and early childhood services in one local area, according to area-level socioeconomic position. Methods: Approximately 3 years after programme initiation, we linked data on the progress of 89 early childhood services and 67 primary schools to an area-level index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage. We compared uptake of and progression through the programme by setting (service or school) and quartiles of socioeconomic position. Results: About 89% of early childhood services and 70% of primary schools had registered for the programme, with 18% and 15%, respectively, attaining the goal of completing the final stage. A greater proportion of settings in areas in the most disadvantaged quartile had registered for the programme and completed the final stage of the programme, compared with settings in areas in the least disadvantaged quartile. However, variation by socioeconomic position was not linear across quartiles. Conclusion: The Achievement Program did not appear to be inequitable in its uptake. Research into uptake in other local areas and outcomes achieved would be beneficial. So what?: This demonstrates that whole-of-setting approaches can potentially be an equity-enhancing approach to health promotion.

AB - Issue addressed: Whole-of-setting initiatives have been recommended as an equitable approach to health promotion. However, there has been little analysis of differences in uptake of such approaches according to indicators of socioeconomic position. In Victoria, Australia, the Achievement Program is a state government health promotion initiative that uses a whole-of-setting approach in early childhood services, schools and workplaces. We conducted an exploratory comparison of uptake of and progression through the programme by schools and early childhood services in one local area, according to area-level socioeconomic position. Methods: Approximately 3 years after programme initiation, we linked data on the progress of 89 early childhood services and 67 primary schools to an area-level index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage. We compared uptake of and progression through the programme by setting (service or school) and quartiles of socioeconomic position. Results: About 89% of early childhood services and 70% of primary schools had registered for the programme, with 18% and 15%, respectively, attaining the goal of completing the final stage. A greater proportion of settings in areas in the most disadvantaged quartile had registered for the programme and completed the final stage of the programme, compared with settings in areas in the least disadvantaged quartile. However, variation by socioeconomic position was not linear across quartiles. Conclusion: The Achievement Program did not appear to be inequitable in its uptake. Research into uptake in other local areas and outcomes achieved would be beneficial. So what?: This demonstrates that whole-of-setting approaches can potentially be an equity-enhancing approach to health promotion.

KW - children

KW - health equity

KW - health promoting schools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064216720&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hpja.45

DO - 10.1002/hpja.45

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 276

EP - 280

JO - Health Promotion Journal of Australia

JF - Health Promotion Journal of Australia

SN - 1036-1073

IS - 2

ER -