TY - JOUR
T1 - Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews
T2 - a scoping review protocol
AU - Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
AU - Hutton, Brian
AU - Stevens, Adrienne
AU - McKenzie, Joanne E.
AU - Page, Matthew J.
AU - Moher, David
AU - McGowan, Jessie
AU - Straus, Sharon E.
AU - Li, Tianjing
AU - Munn, Zachary
AU - Pollock, Danielle
AU - Colquhoun, Heather
AU - Godfrey, Christina
AU - Smith, Maureen
AU - Tufte, Janice
AU - Logan, Sherrie
AU - Catalá-López, Ferrán
AU - Tovey, David
AU - Franco, Juan V.A.
AU - Chang, Stephanie
AU - Garritty, Chantelle
AU - Hartling, Lisa
AU - Horsley, Tanya
AU - Langlois, Etienne V.
AU - McInnes, Matthew
AU - Offringa, Martin
AU - Welch, Vivian
AU - Pritchard, Chris
AU - Khalil, Hanan
AU - Mittmann, Nicole
AU - Peters, Micah
AU - Konstantinidis, Menelaos
AU - Elsman, Ellen B.M.
AU - Kelly, Shannon E.
AU - Aldcroft, Adrian
AU - Thirugnanasampanthar, Sai Surabi
AU - Dourka, Jasmeen
AU - Neupane, Dipika
AU - Well, George
AU - Akl, Elie
AU - Wilson, Michael
AU - Soares-Weiser, Karla
AU - Tricco, Andrea C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to develop a list of items for potential inclusion in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for network meta-analysis (NMA), scoping reviews (ScRs), and rapid reviews (RRs). Introduction: The PRISMA extensions for NMA and ScRs were published in 2015 and 2018. However, since then, their methodologies and innovations, including automation, have evolved. There is no reporting guideline for RRs. In 2020, an updated PRISMA statement was published, reflecting advances in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. These advances are not yet incorporated into these PRISMA extensions. We will update our previous methods scoping reviews to inform the update of PRISMA-NMA and PRISMA-ScR as well as the development of the PRISMA-RR reporting guidelines. Inclusion criteria: This review will include any study designs evaluating the completeness of reporting, or offering reporting guidance, or assessing methods relevant to NMA, ScRs, or RRs. Editorial guidelines and tutorials that describe items related to reporting completeness will also be eligible. Methods: We will follow the JBI guidance for scoping reviews. For each PRISMA extension, we will (1) search multiple electronic databases from inception, (2) search for unpublished studies, and (3) scan the reference lists of included studies. There will be no language limitations. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by 2 researchers independently. A third researcher will resolve discrepancies. We will conduct frequency analyses of the identified items. The final list of items will be considered for potential inclusion in the relevant PRISMA reporting guidelines.
AB - Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to develop a list of items for potential inclusion in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for network meta-analysis (NMA), scoping reviews (ScRs), and rapid reviews (RRs). Introduction: The PRISMA extensions for NMA and ScRs were published in 2015 and 2018. However, since then, their methodologies and innovations, including automation, have evolved. There is no reporting guideline for RRs. In 2020, an updated PRISMA statement was published, reflecting advances in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. These advances are not yet incorporated into these PRISMA extensions. We will update our previous methods scoping reviews to inform the update of PRISMA-NMA and PRISMA-ScR as well as the development of the PRISMA-RR reporting guidelines. Inclusion criteria: This review will include any study designs evaluating the completeness of reporting, or offering reporting guidance, or assessing methods relevant to NMA, ScRs, or RRs. Editorial guidelines and tutorials that describe items related to reporting completeness will also be eligible. Methods: We will follow the JBI guidance for scoping reviews. For each PRISMA extension, we will (1) search multiple electronic databases from inception, (2) search for unpublished studies, and (3) scan the reference lists of included studies. There will be no language limitations. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by 2 researchers independently. A third researcher will resolve discrepancies. We will conduct frequency analyses of the identified items. The final list of items will be considered for potential inclusion in the relevant PRISMA reporting guidelines.
KW - network meta-analysis
KW - PRISMA
KW - rapid review
KW - reporting guideline
KW - scoping review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215844883&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11124/JBIES-24-00308
DO - 10.11124/JBIES-24-00308
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 39829235
AN - SCOPUS:85215844883
SN - 2689-8381
VL - 23
JO - JBI Evidence Synthesis
JF - JBI Evidence Synthesis
IS - 3
ER -