Update on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery

Are they worth it?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review To consider optimal analgesic strategies for thoracic surgical patients. Recent findings Recent studies have consistently suggested analgesic equivalence between paravertebral and thoracic epidural analgesia. Complications appear to be significantly less common with paravertebral analgesia. Summary There is good evidence that paravertebral block can provide acceptable pain relief compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracotomy. Important side-effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, nausea, and vomiting appear to be less frequent with paravertebral block than with thoracic epidural analgesia. Paravertebral block is associated with better pulmonary function and fewer pulmonary complications than thoracic epidural analgesia. Importantly, contraindications to thoracic epidural analgesia do not preclude paravertebral block, which can also be safely performed in anesthetized patients without an apparent increased risk of neurological injury. The place of paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is less clear.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-43
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Paravertebral block
  • Postoperative pain
  • Thoracic epidural
  • Thoracotomy
  • Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Cite this

@article{446583e148ec479b83206fca48db40b2,
title = "Update on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery: Are they worth it?",
abstract = "Purpose of review To consider optimal analgesic strategies for thoracic surgical patients. Recent findings Recent studies have consistently suggested analgesic equivalence between paravertebral and thoracic epidural analgesia. Complications appear to be significantly less common with paravertebral analgesia. Summary There is good evidence that paravertebral block can provide acceptable pain relief compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracotomy. Important side-effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, nausea, and vomiting appear to be less frequent with paravertebral block than with thoracic epidural analgesia. Paravertebral block is associated with better pulmonary function and fewer pulmonary complications than thoracic epidural analgesia. Importantly, contraindications to thoracic epidural analgesia do not preclude paravertebral block, which can also be safely performed in anesthetized patients without an apparent increased risk of neurological injury. The place of paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is less clear.",
keywords = "Complications, Paravertebral block, Postoperative pain, Thoracic epidural, Thoracotomy, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery",
author = "Daly, {David J.} and Myles, {Paul S.}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831a4074",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "38--43",
journal = "Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology",
issn = "0952-7907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Update on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery : Are they worth it? / Daly, David J.; Myles, Paul S.

In: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 38-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Update on the role of paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery

T2 - Are they worth it?

AU - Daly, David J.

AU - Myles, Paul S.

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - Purpose of review To consider optimal analgesic strategies for thoracic surgical patients. Recent findings Recent studies have consistently suggested analgesic equivalence between paravertebral and thoracic epidural analgesia. Complications appear to be significantly less common with paravertebral analgesia. Summary There is good evidence that paravertebral block can provide acceptable pain relief compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracotomy. Important side-effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, nausea, and vomiting appear to be less frequent with paravertebral block than with thoracic epidural analgesia. Paravertebral block is associated with better pulmonary function and fewer pulmonary complications than thoracic epidural analgesia. Importantly, contraindications to thoracic epidural analgesia do not preclude paravertebral block, which can also be safely performed in anesthetized patients without an apparent increased risk of neurological injury. The place of paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is less clear.

AB - Purpose of review To consider optimal analgesic strategies for thoracic surgical patients. Recent findings Recent studies have consistently suggested analgesic equivalence between paravertebral and thoracic epidural analgesia. Complications appear to be significantly less common with paravertebral analgesia. Summary There is good evidence that paravertebral block can provide acceptable pain relief compared with thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracotomy. Important side-effects such as hypotension, urinary retention, nausea, and vomiting appear to be less frequent with paravertebral block than with thoracic epidural analgesia. Paravertebral block is associated with better pulmonary function and fewer pulmonary complications than thoracic epidural analgesia. Importantly, contraindications to thoracic epidural analgesia do not preclude paravertebral block, which can also be safely performed in anesthetized patients without an apparent increased risk of neurological injury. The place of paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is less clear.

KW - Complications

KW - Paravertebral block

KW - Postoperative pain

KW - Thoracic epidural

KW - Thoracotomy

KW - Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62349102414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831a4074

DO - 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831a4074

M3 - Review Article

VL - 22

SP - 38

EP - 43

JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

SN - 0952-7907

IS - 1

ER -