TY - JOUR
T1 - Unpublished completed obstetric randomized clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
T2 - how big is this issue?
AU - Gupta, Megha
AU - Oliver, Emily A.
AU - Chauhan, Suneet P.
AU - Wagner, Stephen M.
AU - Mol, Ben
AU - Berghella, Vincenzo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study received no funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - BACKGROUND: A portion of obstetrical randomized clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov are not published in peer-reviewed journals. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the characteristics of completed published vs unpublished randomized clinical trials in obstetrics registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and to identify barriers to publication. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study queried ClinicalTrials.gov for all completed obstetrical randomized clinical trials registered between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018. For each completed obstetrical randomized clinical trial, we abstracted the following registration fields from ClinicalTrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, recruitment status, trial start and completion dates, study results, type of intervention, study phase, enrollment size, funder type, location, and facilities. Calculated variables included time to completion. In May 2021, we used PubMed and Google Scholar to identify the publication status of completed trials, and we compared the characteristics of published vs unpublished randomized clinical trials. The corresponding authors’ e-mail addresses for the unpublished studies were collected from ClinicalTrials.gov and departmental websites. Between September 2021 and March 2022, the authors of these completed but unpublished obstetrical randomized clinical trials were contacted and invited to respond to a survey examining perceptions of barriers to publication, responses of which were collected and presented as counts and percentages. RESULTS: Of the 647 obstetrical randomized clinical trials marked as completed on ClinicalTrials.gov, 378 (58%) were published, and 269 (42%) were unpublished. Unpublished trials were more likely to have an enrollment size of <50 participants (14.5% published vs 25.3% unpublished; P<.001) and less likely to be conducted at multiple sites (25.4% published vs 17.5% unpublished; P<.02). The main barriers to publication reported in the survey by authors whose trials were not published included lack of time (30%), change in employment or completion of training (25%), and results that were not of statistical significance (15%). CONCLUSION: Among the obstetrical randomized clinical trials registered and marked as completed on ClinicalTrials.gov, more than 40% were unpublished. Unpublished trials were more likely to be smaller studies, conducted by researchers who reported experiencing a lack of time as the most common barrier to study publication.
AB - BACKGROUND: A portion of obstetrical randomized clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov are not published in peer-reviewed journals. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the characteristics of completed published vs unpublished randomized clinical trials in obstetrics registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and to identify barriers to publication. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study queried ClinicalTrials.gov for all completed obstetrical randomized clinical trials registered between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018. For each completed obstetrical randomized clinical trial, we abstracted the following registration fields from ClinicalTrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, recruitment status, trial start and completion dates, study results, type of intervention, study phase, enrollment size, funder type, location, and facilities. Calculated variables included time to completion. In May 2021, we used PubMed and Google Scholar to identify the publication status of completed trials, and we compared the characteristics of published vs unpublished randomized clinical trials. The corresponding authors’ e-mail addresses for the unpublished studies were collected from ClinicalTrials.gov and departmental websites. Between September 2021 and March 2022, the authors of these completed but unpublished obstetrical randomized clinical trials were contacted and invited to respond to a survey examining perceptions of barriers to publication, responses of which were collected and presented as counts and percentages. RESULTS: Of the 647 obstetrical randomized clinical trials marked as completed on ClinicalTrials.gov, 378 (58%) were published, and 269 (42%) were unpublished. Unpublished trials were more likely to have an enrollment size of <50 participants (14.5% published vs 25.3% unpublished; P<.001) and less likely to be conducted at multiple sites (25.4% published vs 17.5% unpublished; P<.02). The main barriers to publication reported in the survey by authors whose trials were not published included lack of time (30%), change in employment or completion of training (25%), and results that were not of statistical significance (15%). CONCLUSION: Among the obstetrical randomized clinical trials registered and marked as completed on ClinicalTrials.gov, more than 40% were unpublished. Unpublished trials were more likely to be smaller studies, conducted by researchers who reported experiencing a lack of time as the most common barrier to study publication.
KW - publication bias
KW - randomized clinical trials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164746638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101066
DO - 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101066
M3 - Article
C2 - 37419451
AN - SCOPUS:85164746638
SN - 2589-9333
VL - 5
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
IS - 9
M1 - 101066
ER -