TY - JOUR
T1 - Unknown safety and efficacy of alcohol hangover treatments puts consumers at risk
AU - Verster, Joris C.
AU - van Rossum, Charmaine Ji
AU - Scholey, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Scholey reports personal fees from Sen-Jam Pharmaceutical, grants from BioRevive, outside the submitted work; and in the past 36 months Scholey has held research grants from Abbott Nutrition, Arla Foods, Bayer, BioRevive, DuPont, Kemin Foods, Nestlé, Nutricia-Danone, Verdure Sciences. He has acted as a consultant/expert advisor to Bayer, Danone, Naturex, Nestlé, Pfizer, Sanofi and has received travel/hospitality/speaker fees Bayer, Sanofi and Verdure Sciences. Dr. Verster reports personal fees from ZBiotics, personal fees from Sen-Jam Pharmaceutical, personal fees from More Labs, personal fees from Toast!, personal fees from Tomo, outside the submitted work; and in the past 36 months Verster has held grants from Janssen and Sequential Medicine, and acted as a consultant/expert advisor to Red Bull. MSc van Rossum has nothing to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - It is important that hangover products are both safe and effective. The aims of the current study were to evaluate (a) the ingredients of currently marketed hangover treatments, (b) whether companies make disease modification claims for these products, and (c) the extent and quality of any independent scientific evidence on their efficacy and safety. Of eighty-two hangover products identified, the most common ingredients were vitamin B, vitamin C, milk thistle extract (silymarin), dihydromyricetin (DHM), and N-acetyl L-cysteine (NAC), often in combination. Fifty-one products (62.2% of the 82 evaluated products) contained one or more vitamins of which the dose exceeded the corresponding daily recommended intake level. For 9 (28.1%) of 32 products that reported the dose of Vitamin B3 and 2 (8.0%) of 25 products that reported the dose of Vitamin B9 the corresponding tolerable upper intake level was exceeded. Further, in many other cases the dose of other ingredients was not reported (e.g., dosages of DHM and NAC were not reported by 59% and 73% of the products containing these ingredients), and corresponding tolerable upper limits are unknown. A review of scientific literature revealed no peer-reviewed human data demonstrating either safety or efficacy of any of the 82 evaluated hangover products. Further, the product name and/or package/insert included explicit disease modification claims in 64.6% of the products. Finally, 45.1% of the products contain NAC as an ingredient. As NAC is registered as a drug by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it is prohibited as an ingredient in dietary supplements or foods. We conclude that, in the interest of consumers, independent research supporting the safety and efficacy of hangover treatments should be a minimum requirement for hangover treatment claims irrespective whether the products are registered as medicinal drugs or dietary supplements.
AB - It is important that hangover products are both safe and effective. The aims of the current study were to evaluate (a) the ingredients of currently marketed hangover treatments, (b) whether companies make disease modification claims for these products, and (c) the extent and quality of any independent scientific evidence on their efficacy and safety. Of eighty-two hangover products identified, the most common ingredients were vitamin B, vitamin C, milk thistle extract (silymarin), dihydromyricetin (DHM), and N-acetyl L-cysteine (NAC), often in combination. Fifty-one products (62.2% of the 82 evaluated products) contained one or more vitamins of which the dose exceeded the corresponding daily recommended intake level. For 9 (28.1%) of 32 products that reported the dose of Vitamin B3 and 2 (8.0%) of 25 products that reported the dose of Vitamin B9 the corresponding tolerable upper intake level was exceeded. Further, in many other cases the dose of other ingredients was not reported (e.g., dosages of DHM and NAC were not reported by 59% and 73% of the products containing these ingredients), and corresponding tolerable upper limits are unknown. A review of scientific literature revealed no peer-reviewed human data demonstrating either safety or efficacy of any of the 82 evaluated hangover products. Further, the product name and/or package/insert included explicit disease modification claims in 64.6% of the products. Finally, 45.1% of the products contain NAC as an ingredient. As NAC is registered as a drug by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it is prohibited as an ingredient in dietary supplements or foods. We conclude that, in the interest of consumers, independent research supporting the safety and efficacy of hangover treatments should be a minimum requirement for hangover treatment claims irrespective whether the products are registered as medicinal drugs or dietary supplements.
KW - Alcohol
KW - Efficacy
KW - Hangover
KW - Prevention
KW - Regulatory
KW - Safety
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109439282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107029
DO - 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107029
M3 - Article
C2 - 34225031
AN - SCOPUS:85109439282
SN - 0306-4603
VL - 122
JO - Addictive Behaviors
JF - Addictive Behaviors
M1 - 107029
ER -