Understanding the vertical equity judgements underpinning health inequality measures

Paul Allanson, Dennis Petrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The choice of income-related health inequality measures in comparative studies is often determined by custom and analytical concerns, without much explicit consideration of the vertical equity judgements underlying alternative measures. This note employs an inequality map to illustrate how these judgements determine the ranking of populations by health inequality. In particular, it is shown that relative indices of inequality in health attainments and shortfalls embody distinct vertical equity judgments, where each may represent ethically defensible positions in specific contexts. Further research is needed to explore people's preferences over distributions of income and health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1390-1396
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Economics
Volume23
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health inequality
  • Vertical equity judgements
  • Inequality equivalence criterion
  • Inequality maps

Cite this