Understanding the biosecurity monitoring and reporting intentions of livestock producers: Identifying opportunities for behaviour change

Breanna K. Wright, Bradley S. Jorgensen, Liam D. G. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In many countries, government strategies for biosecurity planning and outbreaks depend upon private livestock producers being willing and able to conduct surveillance of their animals and the timely reporting of suspicious signs of disease. From a behavioural perspective, these two kinds of behaviours – surveillance and reporting – should be treated separately when developing a biosecurity plan in which producers play a key role in the prevention, detection, and reporting of animal diseases. Having an effective surveillance system in place is conceptually and practically independent of a reporting system that is both feasible and trustworthy. The behavioural intentions of 200 Australian producers to monitor their livestock and report to either the government or a private vet were measured in a structured telephone interview. Structural equation modelling revealed that these intentions had different statistical relationships with a common set of predictor variables. Moreover, classification of the producers based on belief about monitoring and surveillance resulted in three contrasting groups. These results are discussed in terms of their meaning for the development of behavioural strategies to promote surveillance and monitoring of animal disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-151
Number of pages10
JournalPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume157
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Behaviour
  • Exotic disease
  • Monitoring
  • Reporting
  • Surveillance

Cite this

@article{f3ed06a659a946abb46ec24365bea7dc,
title = "Understanding the biosecurity monitoring and reporting intentions of livestock producers: Identifying opportunities for behaviour change",
abstract = "In many countries, government strategies for biosecurity planning and outbreaks depend upon private livestock producers being willing and able to conduct surveillance of their animals and the timely reporting of suspicious signs of disease. From a behavioural perspective, these two kinds of behaviours – surveillance and reporting – should be treated separately when developing a biosecurity plan in which producers play a key role in the prevention, detection, and reporting of animal diseases. Having an effective surveillance system in place is conceptually and practically independent of a reporting system that is both feasible and trustworthy. The behavioural intentions of 200 Australian producers to monitor their livestock and report to either the government or a private vet were measured in a structured telephone interview. Structural equation modelling revealed that these intentions had different statistical relationships with a common set of predictor variables. Moreover, classification of the producers based on belief about monitoring and surveillance resulted in three contrasting groups. These results are discussed in terms of their meaning for the development of behavioural strategies to promote surveillance and monitoring of animal disease.",
keywords = "Behaviour, Exotic disease, Monitoring, Reporting, Surveillance",
author = "Wright, {Breanna K.} and Jorgensen, {Bradley S.} and Smith, {Liam D. G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "157",
pages = "142--151",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Understanding the biosecurity monitoring and reporting intentions of livestock producers : Identifying opportunities for behaviour change. / Wright, Breanna K.; Jorgensen, Bradley S.; Smith, Liam D. G.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 157, 01.09.2018, p. 142-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the biosecurity monitoring and reporting intentions of livestock producers

T2 - Identifying opportunities for behaviour change

AU - Wright, Breanna K.

AU - Jorgensen, Bradley S.

AU - Smith, Liam D. G.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - In many countries, government strategies for biosecurity planning and outbreaks depend upon private livestock producers being willing and able to conduct surveillance of their animals and the timely reporting of suspicious signs of disease. From a behavioural perspective, these two kinds of behaviours – surveillance and reporting – should be treated separately when developing a biosecurity plan in which producers play a key role in the prevention, detection, and reporting of animal diseases. Having an effective surveillance system in place is conceptually and practically independent of a reporting system that is both feasible and trustworthy. The behavioural intentions of 200 Australian producers to monitor their livestock and report to either the government or a private vet were measured in a structured telephone interview. Structural equation modelling revealed that these intentions had different statistical relationships with a common set of predictor variables. Moreover, classification of the producers based on belief about monitoring and surveillance resulted in three contrasting groups. These results are discussed in terms of their meaning for the development of behavioural strategies to promote surveillance and monitoring of animal disease.

AB - In many countries, government strategies for biosecurity planning and outbreaks depend upon private livestock producers being willing and able to conduct surveillance of their animals and the timely reporting of suspicious signs of disease. From a behavioural perspective, these two kinds of behaviours – surveillance and reporting – should be treated separately when developing a biosecurity plan in which producers play a key role in the prevention, detection, and reporting of animal diseases. Having an effective surveillance system in place is conceptually and practically independent of a reporting system that is both feasible and trustworthy. The behavioural intentions of 200 Australian producers to monitor their livestock and report to either the government or a private vet were measured in a structured telephone interview. Structural equation modelling revealed that these intentions had different statistical relationships with a common set of predictor variables. Moreover, classification of the producers based on belief about monitoring and surveillance resulted in three contrasting groups. These results are discussed in terms of their meaning for the development of behavioural strategies to promote surveillance and monitoring of animal disease.

KW - Behaviour

KW - Exotic disease

KW - Monitoring

KW - Reporting

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049506467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 157

SP - 142

EP - 151

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

ER -