TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Coordinator Roles in Acute Stroke Care
T2 - A National Survey
AU - Purvis, Tara
AU - Middleton, Sandy
AU - Alexandrov, Anne W.
AU - Kilkenny, Monique F.
AU - Coote, Skye
AU - Kuhle, Sarah
AU - Cadilhac, Dominique A.
N1 - Funding Information:
DC acknowledges a research fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NMHRC) ( 1154273 ). MK acknowledges support from an Early Career Fellowship from the NHMRC ( 1109426 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Objectives: Coordinators contribute to stroke care quality. Evidence on the scope of practice of coordinator roles for stroke is lacking. We aimed to survey Australian stroke coordinators and describe their responsibilities and characteristics, and compare these based on perceived competency. Materials and Methods: Online survey of non-physician coordinators with a clinical leadership position for acute stroke in Australian hospitals. Participants were identified from the Stroke Foundation National Audit, and advertising via national associations/networks. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; characteristics and responsibilities assessed by Benner's self-perceived competency (novice/advanced beginner/competent, proficient or expert). Inductive thematic analysis was used for open-ended responses. Results: Results from 105/141 coordinators (103 hospitals, 90% female, 90% registered nurses). Two-thirds developed the role/were self-taught, with 36% using the ‘stroke coordinator’ title. Perceived competency varied; 22% expert, 40% proficient, and 33% competent. A variety of important clinical tasks, along with leadership/management, education and research responsibilities were described. Most frequently reported clinical responsibility was discharge planning (77%), with patient and staff education (85% and 88%), and data collection (94%) common. Compared to those reporting lesser competency, ‘experts’ had greater involvement in outpatient clinics (50% vs 14%) and leadership/management responsibilities (e.g. local hospital committees 77% vs 46%). ‘Knowledge of evidence’ and ‘empowering others’ were important characteristics to ‘expert’ coordinators. Conclusions: A contemporary understanding of important responsibilities and characteristics of acute stroke coordinators are provided. Perceived competency affected scope of practice. Structured education, training and role delineation is warranted to improve competency. Career development of stroke coordinators is urgently needed to support optimal role performance.
AB - Objectives: Coordinators contribute to stroke care quality. Evidence on the scope of practice of coordinator roles for stroke is lacking. We aimed to survey Australian stroke coordinators and describe their responsibilities and characteristics, and compare these based on perceived competency. Materials and Methods: Online survey of non-physician coordinators with a clinical leadership position for acute stroke in Australian hospitals. Participants were identified from the Stroke Foundation National Audit, and advertising via national associations/networks. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; characteristics and responsibilities assessed by Benner's self-perceived competency (novice/advanced beginner/competent, proficient or expert). Inductive thematic analysis was used for open-ended responses. Results: Results from 105/141 coordinators (103 hospitals, 90% female, 90% registered nurses). Two-thirds developed the role/were self-taught, with 36% using the ‘stroke coordinator’ title. Perceived competency varied; 22% expert, 40% proficient, and 33% competent. A variety of important clinical tasks, along with leadership/management, education and research responsibilities were described. Most frequently reported clinical responsibility was discharge planning (77%), with patient and staff education (85% and 88%), and data collection (94%) common. Compared to those reporting lesser competency, ‘experts’ had greater involvement in outpatient clinics (50% vs 14%) and leadership/management responsibilities (e.g. local hospital committees 77% vs 46%). ‘Knowledge of evidence’ and ‘empowering others’ were important characteristics to ‘expert’ coordinators. Conclusions: A contemporary understanding of important responsibilities and characteristics of acute stroke coordinators are provided. Perceived competency affected scope of practice. Structured education, training and role delineation is warranted to improve competency. Career development of stroke coordinators is urgently needed to support optimal role performance.
KW - Acute
KW - Characteristics
KW - Competency
KW - Coordinator
KW - Facilitator
KW - Responsibilities
KW - Scope
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115983617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106111
DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106111
M3 - Article
C2 - 34600180
AN - SCOPUS:85115983617
SN - 1052-3057
VL - 30
JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
IS - 12
M1 - 106111
ER -