TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding bikeability
T2 - a methodology to assess urban networks
AU - Reggiani, Giulia
AU - van Oijen, Tim
AU - Hamedmoghadam, Homayoun
AU - Daamen, Winnie
AU - Vu, Hai L.
AU - Hoogendoorn, Serge
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the ALLEGRO project, which is financed by the European Research Council (Grant Agreement No. 669792) and the Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions. G.R. thanks Prof. Vu for hosting her at Monash University during a visit that initiated this study. GR was supported by the Strategic Alliance Student Exchange Program (SASXP) from the Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne Australia. We are grateful to Ph.D. Konstanze Winter for making available the travel demand data. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments which improved the quality of this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - A fully separated bicycle network from vehicular traffic is not realistic even for the most bicycle-friendly cities. Thus, all around the world urban cycling entails switching between streets of different safety, convenience, and comfort levels. As a consequence, the quality of bicycle networks should be evaluated not based on one but multiple factors and by considering the different user preferences regarding these factors. More comprehensive methodologies to assess urban bicycle networks are essential to the operation and planning of modern city transportation. This work proposes a multi-objective methodology to assess—what we refer to as—bikeability between origin–destination locations and over the entire network, useful for evaluation and planning of bicycle networks. We do so by introducing the concept of bikeability curves which allows us to assess the quality of cycling in a city network with respect to the heterogeneity of user preferences. The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated on two cities with different bike cultures: Amsterdam and Melbourne. Our results suggest the effectiveness of bikeability curves in describing the characteristic features and differences in the two networks.
AB - A fully separated bicycle network from vehicular traffic is not realistic even for the most bicycle-friendly cities. Thus, all around the world urban cycling entails switching between streets of different safety, convenience, and comfort levels. As a consequence, the quality of bicycle networks should be evaluated not based on one but multiple factors and by considering the different user preferences regarding these factors. More comprehensive methodologies to assess urban bicycle networks are essential to the operation and planning of modern city transportation. This work proposes a multi-objective methodology to assess—what we refer to as—bikeability between origin–destination locations and over the entire network, useful for evaluation and planning of bicycle networks. We do so by introducing the concept of bikeability curves which allows us to assess the quality of cycling in a city network with respect to the heterogeneity of user preferences. The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated on two cities with different bike cultures: Amsterdam and Melbourne. Our results suggest the effectiveness of bikeability curves in describing the characteristic features and differences in the two networks.
KW - Bikeability
KW - Complex network analysis
KW - Multi-layer networks
KW - Multi-objective optimisation
KW - Urban traffic networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107584111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11116-021-10198-0
DO - 10.1007/s11116-021-10198-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107584111
VL - 49
SP - 897
EP - 925
JO - Transportation
JF - Transportation
SN - 0049-4488
ER -