TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncovering healthcare staff attitudes to the rapid deployment of telehealth in Victoria, 2020–2021
T2 - a 12-month telehealth experience
AU - Shannon, Michelle M.
AU - Callum, Shona M.
AU - Callisaya, Michele L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background: Telehealth was widely adopted in health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unknown what the attitudes and ongoing needs of healthcare staff are after a rapid implementation of telehealth. Aims: To evaluate staff attitudes to telehealth utilisation after a rapid implementation. Methods: A health service-wide bespoke survey was sent to all clinicians, managers and administration staff in June–July 2021. We evaluated attitudes to: (i) telehealth application in the model of care; and (ii) the barriers and enablers to use of telehealth. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data, and content analysis for the textual data. Results: One hundred and thirty-four respondents completed the survey (response rate = 22.5% of healthdirect users (71/315), and 3.2% of total healthcare staff population). Most commonly, telehealth was identified as being important (78%) and safe (79%) by clinicians, and important (100%) and encouraged (88%) by managers. In contrast, telehealth was identified as not the same as face to face (56%; 50%), but easy to add to usual work arrangements (43%; 44%) by clinicians and managers respectively. The most common enablers of telehealth were: (i) having others use the same telehealth platform (74.3%; 100%); and (ii) completing training (68.9%; 72.7%) by clinicians and managers respectively. The most common barriers were having: (i) reliable Internet connectivity (39.2%; 45.5%) by clinicians and managers, respectively; (ii) the right equipment (clinician 37.8%); and (iii) a private area (managers 36.3%). Conclusions: Despite training and having support from colleagues to implement telehealth, ongoing needs were identified that may promote uptake in specific health settings.
AB - Background: Telehealth was widely adopted in health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unknown what the attitudes and ongoing needs of healthcare staff are after a rapid implementation of telehealth. Aims: To evaluate staff attitudes to telehealth utilisation after a rapid implementation. Methods: A health service-wide bespoke survey was sent to all clinicians, managers and administration staff in June–July 2021. We evaluated attitudes to: (i) telehealth application in the model of care; and (ii) the barriers and enablers to use of telehealth. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data, and content analysis for the textual data. Results: One hundred and thirty-four respondents completed the survey (response rate = 22.5% of healthdirect users (71/315), and 3.2% of total healthcare staff population). Most commonly, telehealth was identified as being important (78%) and safe (79%) by clinicians, and important (100%) and encouraged (88%) by managers. In contrast, telehealth was identified as not the same as face to face (56%; 50%), but easy to add to usual work arrangements (43%; 44%) by clinicians and managers respectively. The most common enablers of telehealth were: (i) having others use the same telehealth platform (74.3%; 100%); and (ii) completing training (68.9%; 72.7%) by clinicians and managers respectively. The most common barriers were having: (i) reliable Internet connectivity (39.2%; 45.5%) by clinicians and managers, respectively; (ii) the right equipment (clinician 37.8%); and (iii) a private area (managers 36.3%). Conclusions: Despite training and having support from colleagues to implement telehealth, ongoing needs were identified that may promote uptake in specific health settings.
KW - health service utilisation
KW - implementation
KW - survey
KW - telehealth
KW - telemedicine
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85137836523
U2 - 10.1111/imj.15750
DO - 10.1111/imj.15750
M3 - Article
C2 - 35289486
AN - SCOPUS:85137836523
SN - 1444-0903
VL - 53
SP - 1018
EP - 1026
JO - Internal Medicine Journal
JF - Internal Medicine Journal
IS - 6
ER -