Uncomfortable bedfellows

employer perspectives on general practitioners’ role in the return-to-work process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Workers’ compensation authorities expect that various stakeholders – insurers, employers, injured workers and healthcare providers – work together to help return an injured worker to early, safe and sustainable employment. To date, research examining interactions between employers and healthcare providers, in the context of return to work, is limited. Based on data gathered via qualitative, in-depth interviews with employers, our paper addresses this gap. We examine the perspectives of a group of employers from Melbourne, Australia who have had experience with return to work and, specifically, their interactions with general practitioners during this process. Our findings indicate that while employers view general practitioners as important decision-makers in the return-to-work process, they often have difficulty making contact with general practitioners and working collaboratively on a return-to-work plan. They feel that general practitioners’ lack of engagement in the return-to-work process is due to the administrative complexity of the workers’ compensation system, limited remuneration and lack of knowledge of the workplace. Employers’ feelings of exclusion, along with a view that some injured workers will ‘cheat the system’, make some employers suspicious of the doctor–patient relationship, making collaboration more difficult. Including employers in an employee’s return to work can signify that they have influence over processes that can profoundly affect their workplaces and provide decision-makers with important information about available duties and workplace organisation. Streamlined administrative processes, higher remuneration for general practitioners and the engagement of return-to-work coordinators can also facilitate the return-to-work process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-76
Number of pages12
JournalPolicy and Practice in Health and Safety
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

Keywords

  • Employers
  • Employment
  • General practice
  • Health and safety
  • Healthcare provider role
  • Return to Work

Cite this

@article{63210157397a47bb9d3c71601516e2a6,
title = "Uncomfortable bedfellows: employer perspectives on general practitioners’ role in the return-to-work process",
abstract = "Workers’ compensation authorities expect that various stakeholders – insurers, employers, injured workers and healthcare providers – work together to help return an injured worker to early, safe and sustainable employment. To date, research examining interactions between employers and healthcare providers, in the context of return to work, is limited. Based on data gathered via qualitative, in-depth interviews with employers, our paper addresses this gap. We examine the perspectives of a group of employers from Melbourne, Australia who have had experience with return to work and, specifically, their interactions with general practitioners during this process. Our findings indicate that while employers view general practitioners as important decision-makers in the return-to-work process, they often have difficulty making contact with general practitioners and working collaboratively on a return-to-work plan. They feel that general practitioners’ lack of engagement in the return-to-work process is due to the administrative complexity of the workers’ compensation system, limited remuneration and lack of knowledge of the workplace. Employers’ feelings of exclusion, along with a view that some injured workers will ‘cheat the system’, make some employers suspicious of the doctor–patient relationship, making collaboration more difficult. Including employers in an employee’s return to work can signify that they have influence over processes that can profoundly affect their workplaces and provide decision-makers with important information about available duties and workplace organisation. Streamlined administrative processes, higher remuneration for general practitioners and the engagement of return-to-work coordinators can also facilitate the return-to-work process.",
keywords = "Employers, Employment, General practice, Health and safety, Healthcare provider role, Return to Work",
author = "Agnieszka Kosny and Bianca Brijnath and Nabita Singh and Amy Allen and Alex Collie and Rasa Ruseckaite and Danielle Mazza",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14774003.2015.11667812",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "65--76",
journal = "Policy and Practice in Health and Safety",
issn = "1477-3996",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncomfortable bedfellows

T2 - employer perspectives on general practitioners’ role in the return-to-work process

AU - Kosny, Agnieszka

AU - Brijnath, Bianca

AU - Singh, Nabita

AU - Allen, Amy

AU - Collie, Alex

AU - Ruseckaite, Rasa

AU - Mazza, Danielle

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Workers’ compensation authorities expect that various stakeholders – insurers, employers, injured workers and healthcare providers – work together to help return an injured worker to early, safe and sustainable employment. To date, research examining interactions between employers and healthcare providers, in the context of return to work, is limited. Based on data gathered via qualitative, in-depth interviews with employers, our paper addresses this gap. We examine the perspectives of a group of employers from Melbourne, Australia who have had experience with return to work and, specifically, their interactions with general practitioners during this process. Our findings indicate that while employers view general practitioners as important decision-makers in the return-to-work process, they often have difficulty making contact with general practitioners and working collaboratively on a return-to-work plan. They feel that general practitioners’ lack of engagement in the return-to-work process is due to the administrative complexity of the workers’ compensation system, limited remuneration and lack of knowledge of the workplace. Employers’ feelings of exclusion, along with a view that some injured workers will ‘cheat the system’, make some employers suspicious of the doctor–patient relationship, making collaboration more difficult. Including employers in an employee’s return to work can signify that they have influence over processes that can profoundly affect their workplaces and provide decision-makers with important information about available duties and workplace organisation. Streamlined administrative processes, higher remuneration for general practitioners and the engagement of return-to-work coordinators can also facilitate the return-to-work process.

AB - Workers’ compensation authorities expect that various stakeholders – insurers, employers, injured workers and healthcare providers – work together to help return an injured worker to early, safe and sustainable employment. To date, research examining interactions between employers and healthcare providers, in the context of return to work, is limited. Based on data gathered via qualitative, in-depth interviews with employers, our paper addresses this gap. We examine the perspectives of a group of employers from Melbourne, Australia who have had experience with return to work and, specifically, their interactions with general practitioners during this process. Our findings indicate that while employers view general practitioners as important decision-makers in the return-to-work process, they often have difficulty making contact with general practitioners and working collaboratively on a return-to-work plan. They feel that general practitioners’ lack of engagement in the return-to-work process is due to the administrative complexity of the workers’ compensation system, limited remuneration and lack of knowledge of the workplace. Employers’ feelings of exclusion, along with a view that some injured workers will ‘cheat the system’, make some employers suspicious of the doctor–patient relationship, making collaboration more difficult. Including employers in an employee’s return to work can signify that they have influence over processes that can profoundly affect their workplaces and provide decision-makers with important information about available duties and workplace organisation. Streamlined administrative processes, higher remuneration for general practitioners and the engagement of return-to-work coordinators can also facilitate the return-to-work process.

KW - Employers

KW - Employment

KW - General practice

KW - Health and safety

KW - Healthcare provider role

KW - Return to Work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939168829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14774003.2015.11667812

DO - 10.1080/14774003.2015.11667812

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 65

EP - 76

JO - Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

JF - Policy and Practice in Health and Safety

SN - 1477-3996

IS - 1

ER -