Trauma case review

A quality and safety feature of the Victorian State Trauma System

Carolyn Pinto, Peter A Cameron, Belinda Gabbe, Susan McLellan, Tony Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to describe the trauma case review process and its role in a regionalised trauma system. Victoria has a population of 5.9 million people, accounting for 26% of Australia's population. Victoria has been serviced by an inclusive, organised trauma system since 2000 comprising 138 health services with trauma designations and three major trauma services. Pre- and interhospital guidelines prescribe the timely transport of patients to the appropriate level of trauma service. A review of the role and contribution of 10 years of operation of the trauma case review group (CRG) was undertaken to describe the aims, processes and governance surrounding the implementation of an individual case review for specified major trauma patients. Specified patients were those identified by the Victorian State Trauma Registry as being managed outside of established Victorian State Trauma System prehospital and interhospital guidelines. A state-wide trauma case review process was implemented across the trauma system using data-informed detection flags and screening criteria. Using data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry, detection flags were correlated with patients at risk of a poorer outcome, thereby ensuring that all patients managed outside of the requirements of established trauma triage and transfer guidelines were subject to review. The CRG provides an individual review process as a technique for assessing and monitoring major trauma patient care and compliance with trauma system triage and transfer guidelines. The process has been effective as a quality and safety strategy by improving clinician knowledge of major trauma triage and transfer guidelines and facilitating improved compliance, particularly with interhospital transfers. Strong compliance has been achieved from health services with the requirement to internally review and respond to CRG concerns regarding ‘high-risk’ trauma cases. Anecdotal feedback from health services regarding participation in the CRG process has been positive. The trauma case review process is an embedded feature of the Victorian State Trauma System that aims to improve compliance with major trauma guidelines by reviewing major trauma cases that have been managed outside of established triage and transfer guidelines. All trauma-designated Victorian health services, Ambulance Victoria and Victorian adult and paediatric patient retrieval services might receive trauma cases for review. The process is also an integral component of trauma system clinical governance, which enables the identification of system-level issues for escalation to the State Trauma Committee and the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-129
Number of pages5
JournalEMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • case review
  • health service
  • major trauma
  • quality and safety
  • trauma

Cite this

@article{d0df46c0b48b4eb4a3f69d87a5c0e275,
title = "Trauma case review: A quality and safety feature of the Victorian State Trauma System",
abstract = "The aim of the present study was to describe the trauma case review process and its role in a regionalised trauma system. Victoria has a population of 5.9 million people, accounting for 26{\%} of Australia's population. Victoria has been serviced by an inclusive, organised trauma system since 2000 comprising 138 health services with trauma designations and three major trauma services. Pre- and interhospital guidelines prescribe the timely transport of patients to the appropriate level of trauma service. A review of the role and contribution of 10 years of operation of the trauma case review group (CRG) was undertaken to describe the aims, processes and governance surrounding the implementation of an individual case review for specified major trauma patients. Specified patients were those identified by the Victorian State Trauma Registry as being managed outside of established Victorian State Trauma System prehospital and interhospital guidelines. A state-wide trauma case review process was implemented across the trauma system using data-informed detection flags and screening criteria. Using data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry, detection flags were correlated with patients at risk of a poorer outcome, thereby ensuring that all patients managed outside of the requirements of established trauma triage and transfer guidelines were subject to review. The CRG provides an individual review process as a technique for assessing and monitoring major trauma patient care and compliance with trauma system triage and transfer guidelines. The process has been effective as a quality and safety strategy by improving clinician knowledge of major trauma triage and transfer guidelines and facilitating improved compliance, particularly with interhospital transfers. Strong compliance has been achieved from health services with the requirement to internally review and respond to CRG concerns regarding ‘high-risk’ trauma cases. Anecdotal feedback from health services regarding participation in the CRG process has been positive. The trauma case review process is an embedded feature of the Victorian State Trauma System that aims to improve compliance with major trauma guidelines by reviewing major trauma cases that have been managed outside of established triage and transfer guidelines. All trauma-designated Victorian health services, Ambulance Victoria and Victorian adult and paediatric patient retrieval services might receive trauma cases for review. The process is also an integral component of trauma system clinical governance, which enables the identification of system-level issues for escalation to the State Trauma Committee and the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services.",
keywords = "case review, health service, major trauma, quality and safety, trauma",
author = "Carolyn Pinto and Cameron, {Peter A} and Belinda Gabbe and Susan McLellan and Tony Walker",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1742-6723.12896",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "125--129",
journal = "EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia",
issn = "1742-6731",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Trauma case review : A quality and safety feature of the Victorian State Trauma System. / Pinto, Carolyn; Cameron, Peter A; Gabbe, Belinda; McLellan, Susan; Walker, Tony.

In: EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 125-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma case review

T2 - A quality and safety feature of the Victorian State Trauma System

AU - Pinto, Carolyn

AU - Cameron, Peter A

AU - Gabbe, Belinda

AU - McLellan, Susan

AU - Walker, Tony

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - The aim of the present study was to describe the trauma case review process and its role in a regionalised trauma system. Victoria has a population of 5.9 million people, accounting for 26% of Australia's population. Victoria has been serviced by an inclusive, organised trauma system since 2000 comprising 138 health services with trauma designations and three major trauma services. Pre- and interhospital guidelines prescribe the timely transport of patients to the appropriate level of trauma service. A review of the role and contribution of 10 years of operation of the trauma case review group (CRG) was undertaken to describe the aims, processes and governance surrounding the implementation of an individual case review for specified major trauma patients. Specified patients were those identified by the Victorian State Trauma Registry as being managed outside of established Victorian State Trauma System prehospital and interhospital guidelines. A state-wide trauma case review process was implemented across the trauma system using data-informed detection flags and screening criteria. Using data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry, detection flags were correlated with patients at risk of a poorer outcome, thereby ensuring that all patients managed outside of the requirements of established trauma triage and transfer guidelines were subject to review. The CRG provides an individual review process as a technique for assessing and monitoring major trauma patient care and compliance with trauma system triage and transfer guidelines. The process has been effective as a quality and safety strategy by improving clinician knowledge of major trauma triage and transfer guidelines and facilitating improved compliance, particularly with interhospital transfers. Strong compliance has been achieved from health services with the requirement to internally review and respond to CRG concerns regarding ‘high-risk’ trauma cases. Anecdotal feedback from health services regarding participation in the CRG process has been positive. The trauma case review process is an embedded feature of the Victorian State Trauma System that aims to improve compliance with major trauma guidelines by reviewing major trauma cases that have been managed outside of established triage and transfer guidelines. All trauma-designated Victorian health services, Ambulance Victoria and Victorian adult and paediatric patient retrieval services might receive trauma cases for review. The process is also an integral component of trauma system clinical governance, which enables the identification of system-level issues for escalation to the State Trauma Committee and the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services.

AB - The aim of the present study was to describe the trauma case review process and its role in a regionalised trauma system. Victoria has a population of 5.9 million people, accounting for 26% of Australia's population. Victoria has been serviced by an inclusive, organised trauma system since 2000 comprising 138 health services with trauma designations and three major trauma services. Pre- and interhospital guidelines prescribe the timely transport of patients to the appropriate level of trauma service. A review of the role and contribution of 10 years of operation of the trauma case review group (CRG) was undertaken to describe the aims, processes and governance surrounding the implementation of an individual case review for specified major trauma patients. Specified patients were those identified by the Victorian State Trauma Registry as being managed outside of established Victorian State Trauma System prehospital and interhospital guidelines. A state-wide trauma case review process was implemented across the trauma system using data-informed detection flags and screening criteria. Using data from the Victorian State Trauma Registry, detection flags were correlated with patients at risk of a poorer outcome, thereby ensuring that all patients managed outside of the requirements of established trauma triage and transfer guidelines were subject to review. The CRG provides an individual review process as a technique for assessing and monitoring major trauma patient care and compliance with trauma system triage and transfer guidelines. The process has been effective as a quality and safety strategy by improving clinician knowledge of major trauma triage and transfer guidelines and facilitating improved compliance, particularly with interhospital transfers. Strong compliance has been achieved from health services with the requirement to internally review and respond to CRG concerns regarding ‘high-risk’ trauma cases. Anecdotal feedback from health services regarding participation in the CRG process has been positive. The trauma case review process is an embedded feature of the Victorian State Trauma System that aims to improve compliance with major trauma guidelines by reviewing major trauma cases that have been managed outside of established triage and transfer guidelines. All trauma-designated Victorian health services, Ambulance Victoria and Victorian adult and paediatric patient retrieval services might receive trauma cases for review. The process is also an integral component of trauma system clinical governance, which enables the identification of system-level issues for escalation to the State Trauma Committee and the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services.

KW - case review

KW - health service

KW - major trauma

KW - quality and safety

KW - trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041728834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1742-6723.12896

DO - 10.1111/1742-6723.12896

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 125

EP - 129

JO - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

JF - EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia

SN - 1742-6731

IS - 1

ER -