Transport poverty and subjective wellbeing

Sefa Awaworyi Churchill, Russell Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Using 12 waves of longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we examine the relationship between transport poverty and subjective wellbeing. To measure transport poverty, we use indicators that reflect transport affordability and accessibility. Our preferred two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimates, which instrument for transport poverty using NYSE Arca Oil Stock Prices and OPEC oil supply (in millions of barrels), suggest that a standard deviation increase in transport poverty is associated with a decline in subjective wellbeing between 0.318 and 0.544 standard deviations. This general finding is robust to alternative ways of measuring transport poverty, alternative estimation approaches, alternative approaches to addressing endogeneity of transport poverty, and holds irrespective of whether subjective wellbeing is measured using the single-item overall life satisfaction scale or composite scales such as the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) scale or the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-54
Number of pages15
JournalTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Volume124
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Life satisfaction
  • Subjective wellbeing
  • Transport poverty

Cite this

@article{47d04ab84e7145e7a730560ce28ba0e0,
title = "Transport poverty and subjective wellbeing",
abstract = "Using 12 waves of longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we examine the relationship between transport poverty and subjective wellbeing. To measure transport poverty, we use indicators that reflect transport affordability and accessibility. Our preferred two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimates, which instrument for transport poverty using NYSE Arca Oil Stock Prices and OPEC oil supply (in millions of barrels), suggest that a standard deviation increase in transport poverty is associated with a decline in subjective wellbeing between 0.318 and 0.544 standard deviations. This general finding is robust to alternative ways of measuring transport poverty, alternative estimation approaches, alternative approaches to addressing endogeneity of transport poverty, and holds irrespective of whether subjective wellbeing is measured using the single-item overall life satisfaction scale or composite scales such as the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) scale or the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).",
keywords = "Australia, Life satisfaction, Subjective wellbeing, Transport poverty",
author = "{Awaworyi Churchill}, Sefa and Russell Smyth",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.004",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "40--54",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Transport poverty and subjective wellbeing. / Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa; Smyth, Russell.

In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 124, 06.2019, p. 40-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transport poverty and subjective wellbeing

AU - Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa

AU - Smyth, Russell

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Using 12 waves of longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we examine the relationship between transport poverty and subjective wellbeing. To measure transport poverty, we use indicators that reflect transport affordability and accessibility. Our preferred two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimates, which instrument for transport poverty using NYSE Arca Oil Stock Prices and OPEC oil supply (in millions of barrels), suggest that a standard deviation increase in transport poverty is associated with a decline in subjective wellbeing between 0.318 and 0.544 standard deviations. This general finding is robust to alternative ways of measuring transport poverty, alternative estimation approaches, alternative approaches to addressing endogeneity of transport poverty, and holds irrespective of whether subjective wellbeing is measured using the single-item overall life satisfaction scale or composite scales such as the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) scale or the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).

AB - Using 12 waves of longitudinal data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, we examine the relationship between transport poverty and subjective wellbeing. To measure transport poverty, we use indicators that reflect transport affordability and accessibility. Our preferred two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimates, which instrument for transport poverty using NYSE Arca Oil Stock Prices and OPEC oil supply (in millions of barrels), suggest that a standard deviation increase in transport poverty is associated with a decline in subjective wellbeing between 0.318 and 0.544 standard deviations. This general finding is robust to alternative ways of measuring transport poverty, alternative estimation approaches, alternative approaches to addressing endogeneity of transport poverty, and holds irrespective of whether subjective wellbeing is measured using the single-item overall life satisfaction scale or composite scales such as the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) scale or the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).

KW - Australia

KW - Life satisfaction

KW - Subjective wellbeing

KW - Transport poverty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062944652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.004

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 40

EP - 54

JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

SN - 0965-8564

ER -