Transnational comparability of advanced pharmacy practice developmental frameworks

a country-level crossover mapping study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous work by the International Pharmaceutical Federation Education Initiative (FIPEd) demonstrates that even though some country-specific variations occur in pharmacy practice, there exists a set of practice-related competencies that are globally applicable. This study aimed to evaluate the transnational comparability of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Advanced Pharmacy Framework (RPS-APF, Great Britain) and the Advanced Pharmacy Practice Framework for Australia (APPF). The objective was to obtain preliminary data on the transnational applicability of the developmental competencies contained in the two frameworks. Method: A crossover mapping study involving 42 advanced-level pharmacists from four countries was conducted. Qualitative interview (n = 17) was also carried out to explore practitioners’ perception of the frameworks. Result: The average postregistration experience of the practitioners in the crossover study was 19 years. Directly observed within-subject agreement per advanced practice competency ranged from 45% to 86%. This agreement was significant for 87% of the competencies evaluated (k ≥ 0.21; P ≤ 0.05). The lowest agreement was in the ‘governance’ competency (k = 0.13; P = 0.21). Wilcoxon sum rank test showed a statistically significant within-subject difference in the ‘collaborative practice’ cluster (P = 0.043). This was not observed in the other five advanced practice clusters. From the qualitative interviews, practitioners generally perceived the two compared advanced-level frameworks as similar in content and indicated they found the described competencies to be useful for clarifying expectations of practice and identifying skills development needs. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of the comparability and transnational applicability of the advanced pharmacy practice competencies contained in the two national competency development frameworks evaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-559
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • CPD
  • education
  • professional practice
  • workforce

Cite this

@article{d4a1ce7f9536410490ebc5e8834c56e0,
title = "Transnational comparability of advanced pharmacy practice developmental frameworks: a country-level crossover mapping study",
abstract = "Background: Previous work by the International Pharmaceutical Federation Education Initiative (FIPEd) demonstrates that even though some country-specific variations occur in pharmacy practice, there exists a set of practice-related competencies that are globally applicable. This study aimed to evaluate the transnational comparability of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Advanced Pharmacy Framework (RPS-APF, Great Britain) and the Advanced Pharmacy Practice Framework for Australia (APPF). The objective was to obtain preliminary data on the transnational applicability of the developmental competencies contained in the two frameworks. Method: A crossover mapping study involving 42 advanced-level pharmacists from four countries was conducted. Qualitative interview (n = 17) was also carried out to explore practitioners’ perception of the frameworks. Result: The average postregistration experience of the practitioners in the crossover study was 19 years. Directly observed within-subject agreement per advanced practice competency ranged from 45{\%} to 86{\%}. This agreement was significant for 87{\%} of the competencies evaluated (k ≥ 0.21; P ≤ 0.05). The lowest agreement was in the ‘governance’ competency (k = 0.13; P = 0.21). Wilcoxon sum rank test showed a statistically significant within-subject difference in the ‘collaborative practice’ cluster (P = 0.043). This was not observed in the other five advanced practice clusters. From the qualitative interviews, practitioners generally perceived the two compared advanced-level frameworks as similar in content and indicated they found the described competencies to be useful for clarifying expectations of practice and identifying skills development needs. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of the comparability and transnational applicability of the advanced pharmacy practice competencies contained in the two national competency development frameworks evaluated.",
keywords = "CPD, education, professional practice, workforce",
author = "Arit Udoh and Bruno, {Andreia Fradinho} and Bates Ian and Kirsten Galbraith",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijpp.12427",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "550--559",
journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0961-7671",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Transnational comparability of advanced pharmacy practice developmental frameworks : a country-level crossover mapping study. / Udoh, Arit; Bruno, Andreia Fradinho; Ian, Bates; Galbraith, Kirsten .

In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.12.2018, p. 550-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transnational comparability of advanced pharmacy practice developmental frameworks

T2 - a country-level crossover mapping study

AU - Udoh, Arit

AU - Bruno, Andreia Fradinho

AU - Ian, Bates

AU - Galbraith, Kirsten

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Background: Previous work by the International Pharmaceutical Federation Education Initiative (FIPEd) demonstrates that even though some country-specific variations occur in pharmacy practice, there exists a set of practice-related competencies that are globally applicable. This study aimed to evaluate the transnational comparability of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Advanced Pharmacy Framework (RPS-APF, Great Britain) and the Advanced Pharmacy Practice Framework for Australia (APPF). The objective was to obtain preliminary data on the transnational applicability of the developmental competencies contained in the two frameworks. Method: A crossover mapping study involving 42 advanced-level pharmacists from four countries was conducted. Qualitative interview (n = 17) was also carried out to explore practitioners’ perception of the frameworks. Result: The average postregistration experience of the practitioners in the crossover study was 19 years. Directly observed within-subject agreement per advanced practice competency ranged from 45% to 86%. This agreement was significant for 87% of the competencies evaluated (k ≥ 0.21; P ≤ 0.05). The lowest agreement was in the ‘governance’ competency (k = 0.13; P = 0.21). Wilcoxon sum rank test showed a statistically significant within-subject difference in the ‘collaborative practice’ cluster (P = 0.043). This was not observed in the other five advanced practice clusters. From the qualitative interviews, practitioners generally perceived the two compared advanced-level frameworks as similar in content and indicated they found the described competencies to be useful for clarifying expectations of practice and identifying skills development needs. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of the comparability and transnational applicability of the advanced pharmacy practice competencies contained in the two national competency development frameworks evaluated.

AB - Background: Previous work by the International Pharmaceutical Federation Education Initiative (FIPEd) demonstrates that even though some country-specific variations occur in pharmacy practice, there exists a set of practice-related competencies that are globally applicable. This study aimed to evaluate the transnational comparability of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Advanced Pharmacy Framework (RPS-APF, Great Britain) and the Advanced Pharmacy Practice Framework for Australia (APPF). The objective was to obtain preliminary data on the transnational applicability of the developmental competencies contained in the two frameworks. Method: A crossover mapping study involving 42 advanced-level pharmacists from four countries was conducted. Qualitative interview (n = 17) was also carried out to explore practitioners’ perception of the frameworks. Result: The average postregistration experience of the practitioners in the crossover study was 19 years. Directly observed within-subject agreement per advanced practice competency ranged from 45% to 86%. This agreement was significant for 87% of the competencies evaluated (k ≥ 0.21; P ≤ 0.05). The lowest agreement was in the ‘governance’ competency (k = 0.13; P = 0.21). Wilcoxon sum rank test showed a statistically significant within-subject difference in the ‘collaborative practice’ cluster (P = 0.043). This was not observed in the other five advanced practice clusters. From the qualitative interviews, practitioners generally perceived the two compared advanced-level frameworks as similar in content and indicated they found the described competencies to be useful for clarifying expectations of practice and identifying skills development needs. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of the comparability and transnational applicability of the advanced pharmacy practice competencies contained in the two national competency development frameworks evaluated.

KW - CPD

KW - education

KW - professional practice

KW - workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057204345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijpp.12427

DO - 10.1111/ijpp.12427

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 550

EP - 559

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0961-7671

IS - 6

ER -