Translating evidence to practice in the health professions

A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook

Jacqueline Tunnecliff, John Weiner, James E Gaida, Jennifer L Keating, Prue Morgan, Dragan Ilic, Lyn Clearihan, David Davies, Sivalal Sadasivan, Patitapaban Mohanty, Shankar Ganesh, John Reynolds, Stephen Maloney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P<.001); attrition was lower in the Facebook group (P<.001). Conclusion: Research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook can improve clinician knowledge and promote behavior change. No differences in these outcomes were observed between the Twitter and Facebook groups. Brief social media posts are as effective as longer posts for improving knowledge and promoting behavior change. Twitter may be more useful in publicizing information and Facebook for encouraging course completion.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberocw085
Pages (from-to)403-408
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Computer-assisted instruction
  • Education
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Professional
  • Social media

Cite this

@article{9fc834b6a628432b978d9f96b7ef819e,
title = "Translating evidence to practice in the health professions: A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook",
abstract = "Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive {"}practice points{"} on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P<.001); attrition was lower in the Facebook group (P<.001). Conclusion: Research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook can improve clinician knowledge and promote behavior change. No differences in these outcomes were observed between the Twitter and Facebook groups. Brief social media posts are as effective as longer posts for improving knowledge and promoting behavior change. Twitter may be more useful in publicizing information and Facebook for encouraging course completion.",
keywords = "Communication, Computer-assisted instruction, Education, Evidence-based practice, Professional, Social media",
author = "Jacqueline Tunnecliff and John Weiner and Gaida, {James E} and Keating, {Jennifer L} and Prue Morgan and Dragan Ilic and Lyn Clearihan and David Davies and Sivalal Sadasivan and Patitapaban Mohanty and Shankar Ganesh and John Reynolds and Stephen Maloney",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocw085",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "403--408",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Translating evidence to practice in the health professions : A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook. / Tunnecliff, Jacqueline; Weiner, John; Gaida, James E; Keating, Jennifer L; Morgan, Prue; Ilic, Dragan; Clearihan, Lyn; Davies, David; Sadasivan, Sivalal; Mohanty, Patitapaban; Ganesh, Shankar; Reynolds, John; Maloney, Stephen.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, Vol. 24, No. 2, ocw085, 01.03.2017, p. 403-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translating evidence to practice in the health professions

T2 - A randomized trial of Twitter vs Facebook

AU - Tunnecliff, Jacqueline

AU - Weiner, John

AU - Gaida, James E

AU - Keating, Jennifer L

AU - Morgan, Prue

AU - Ilic, Dragan

AU - Clearihan, Lyn

AU - Davies, David

AU - Sadasivan, Sivalal

AU - Mohanty, Patitapaban

AU - Ganesh, Shankar

AU - Reynolds, John

AU - Maloney, Stephen

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P<.001); attrition was lower in the Facebook group (P<.001). Conclusion: Research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook can improve clinician knowledge and promote behavior change. No differences in these outcomes were observed between the Twitter and Facebook groups. Brief social media posts are as effective as longer posts for improving knowledge and promoting behavior change. Twitter may be more useful in publicizing information and Facebook for encouraging course completion.

AB - Objective: Our objective was to compare the change in research informed knowledge of health professionals and their intended practice following exposure to research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook. Methods: This open label comparative design study randomized health professional clinicians to receive "practice points" on tendinopathy management via Twitter or Facebook. Evaluated outcomes included knowledge change and self-reported changes to clinical practice. Results: Four hundred and ninety-four participants were randomized to 1 of 2 groups and 317 responders analyzed. Both groups demonstrated improvements in knowledge and reported changes to clinical practice. There was no statistical difference between groups for the outcomes of knowledge change (P=.728), changes to clinical practice (P=.11) or the increased use of research information (P=.89). Practice points were shared more by the Twitter group (P<.001); attrition was lower in the Facebook group (P<.001). Conclusion: Research information delivered by either Twitter or Facebook can improve clinician knowledge and promote behavior change. No differences in these outcomes were observed between the Twitter and Facebook groups. Brief social media posts are as effective as longer posts for improving knowledge and promoting behavior change. Twitter may be more useful in publicizing information and Facebook for encouraging course completion.

KW - Communication

KW - Computer-assisted instruction

KW - Education

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Professional

KW - Social media

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016334323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocw085

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocw085

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 403

EP - 408

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 2

M1 - ocw085

ER -