Tranexamic acid in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (STOP-AUST): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Atte Meretoja, Nawaf Yassi, Teddy Y. Wu, Leonid Churilov, Gerli Sibolt, Jiann Shing Jeng, Timothy Kleinig, Neil J. Spratt, Vincent Thijs, Tissa Wijeratne, Der Yang Cho, Darshan Shah, Geoffrey C. Cloud, Thanh Phan, Christopher Bladin, Andrew Moey, Richard I. Aviv, Christen D. Barras, Gagan Sharma, Chung Y. HsuHenry Ma, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Peter Mitchell, Bernard Yan, Mark W. Parsons, Marjaana Tiainen, Sami Curtze, Daniel Strbian, Sung Chun Tang, Jackson Harvey, Christopher Levi, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Stephen M. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Despite intracerebral haemorrhage causing 5% of deaths worldwide, few evidence-based therapeutic strategies other than stroke unit care exist. Tranexamic acid decreases haemorrhage in conditions such as acute trauma and menorrhoea. We aimed to assess whether tranexamic acid reduces intracerebral haemorrhage growth in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage. Methods: We did a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, investigator-led, phase 2 trial at 13 stroke centres in Australia, Finland, and Taiwan. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had an acute intracerebral haemorrhage fulfilling clinical criteria (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale score of >7, intracerebral haemorrhage volume <70 mL, no identified or suspected secondary cause of intracerebral haemorrhage, no thrombotic events within the previous 12 months, no planned surgery in the next 24 h, and no use of anticoagulation), had contrast extravasation on CT angiography (the so-called spot sign), and were treatable within 4·5 h of symptom onset and within 1 h of CT angiography. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 1 g of intravenous tranexamic acid over 10 min followed by 1 g over 8 h or matching placebo, started within 4·5 h of symptom onset. Randomisation was done using a centralised web-based procedure with randomly permuted blocks of varying size. All patients, investigators, and staff involved in patient management were masked to treatment. The primary outcome was intracerebral haemorrhage growth (>33% relative or >6 mL absolute) at 24 h. The primary and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at (NCT01702636). Findings: Between March 1, 2013, and Aug 13, 2019, we enrolled and randomly assigned 100 participants to the tranexamic acid group (n=50) or the placebo group (n=50). Median age was 71 years (IQR 57–79) and median intracerebral haemorrhage volume was 14·6 mL (7·9–32·7) at baseline. The primary outcome was not different between the two groups: 26 (52%) patients in the placebo group and 22 (44%) in the tranexamic acid group had intracerebral haemorrhage growth (odds ratio [OR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·32–1·59], p=0·41). There was no evidence of a difference in the proportions of patients who died or had thromboembolic complications between the groups: eight (16%) in the placebo group vs 13 (26%) in the tranexamic acid group died and two (4%) vs one (2%) had thromboembolic complications. None of the deaths was considered related to study medication. Interpretation: Our study does not provide evidence that tranexamic acid prevents intracerebral haemorrhage growth, although the treatment was safe with no increase in thromboembolic complications. Larger trials of tranexamic acid, with simpler recruitment methods and an earlier treatment window, are justified. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council, Royal Melbourne Hospital Foundation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)980-987
Number of pages8
JournalThe Lancet Neurology
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Cite this