Abstract
There is no doubt that the use of evidence is a high-priority issue for leaders in many education jurisdictions internationally (Brown, 2015; Nelson & Campbell, 2019; Penuel et al., 2016). Within Australia, there have been growing calls for the development of an “evidencebased approach” (Productivity Commission, 2016), a “research-rich profession” (White et al., 2018), and a “national evidence institute” (Department of Education and Training, 2018). This article focusses on a specific question that will be integral to these developments – What does it mean to use research evidence well in education? Using evidence well is about moving from a focus on the quality of evidence towards a focus on the quality of use. This is important because improved evidence use in education requires clarity about not only what counts as quality evidence, but also what counts as quality use. To date, there has been wide-ranging debate about the former (see Nutley, Powell, & Davies, 2013), but very little dialogue about the latter. Consequently, this article shares early ideas from the Q Project (Quality Use of Evidence Driving Quality Education), a five-year study focussed specifically on the quality use of research evidence within Australian schools. We start by providing some background on the Q Project, before outlining an early definition and framework of quality use. The different components of this framework are then unpacked, and their implications for educational leadership are discussed. We argue that the ideas presented here can help leaders to reflect on how they are approaching and supporting the use of research evidence, both personally and within their organisations and systems. Finally, we extend an invitation for you to become involved with the Q Project and the process of working towards quality use of research evidence in Australian education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 24-28 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | The Australian Educational Leader |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Evidence base
- Evidence use
- Evidence use and evidence generation in practice development
- Evidence-based education
- Evidence based teaching
-
A framework for understanding the quality of evidence use in education
Rickinson, M., Cirkony, C., Walsh, L., Gleeson, J., Cutler, B. & Salisbury, M., 2022, In: Educational Research. 64, 2, p. 133-158 26 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
Open AccessFile21 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus) -
From "finding time" to "investing time": the importance of time and leadership for cultivating cultures of quality research use
Cutler, B., Gleeson, J., Rickinson, M., Walsh, L., Salisbury, M. & Cirkony, C., 2022, In: The Australian Educational Leader. 44, 2, p. 30-33 4 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Other
-
Educators’ collaborative use of research to inform practice
Rickinson, M., Gleeson, J., Walsh, L., Cirkony, C., Salisbury, M. & Cutler, B., 2021. 1 p.Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract
Open Access
Press/Media
-
Australian teachers collaborate for groundbreaking project
Walsh, L., Cutler, B., Rickinson, M., Gleeson, J. & Hall, G.
23/10/23
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media: Profile/Interview
-
Using research well: a framework for understanding quality use of research evidence
Rickinson, M., Walsh, L., Gleeson, J., Cirkony, C. & Salisbury, M.
2/01/21
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Blogs, Podcasts and Social Media › Blogs
-
Trusting quality evidence in the post-pandemic world starts in our schools
Walsh, L., Cirkony, C., Rickinson, M., Gleeson, J. & Salisbury, M.
29/09/20
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Expert Comment
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver