Towards a new business history?

Abe de Jong, David Michael Higgins, Hugo van Driel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article calls for a discussion about business history research. We advocate that the current typical approach in business history – dominantly case study analysis – maintains its prominent position, but the purpose and relevance of this type of research in the scientific method for business history is made more explicit. Moreover, the article proposes the application of additional approaches in business history, which specifically aim to develop theory and test hypotheses. These approaches are well established in the social sciences, but require adaptation to the particular needs of business history. The purpose of this article is to argue that opportunities for scientific explanations in business history are enhanced by engagement with the circle of knowledge creation where theory is confronted with empirical evidence and empirical observations feed back into theory formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-29
Number of pages25
JournalBusiness History
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • business
  • history

Cite this

de Jong, Abe ; Higgins, David Michael ; van Driel, Hugo. / Towards a new business history?. In: Business History. 2015 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 5-29.
@article{3e3ec53c2f574c3790a9e3021afb8e5c,
title = "Towards a new business history?",
abstract = "This article calls for a discussion about business history research. We advocate that the current typical approach in business history – dominantly case study analysis – maintains its prominent position, but the purpose and relevance of this type of research in the scientific method for business history is made more explicit. Moreover, the article proposes the application of additional approaches in business history, which specifically aim to develop theory and test hypotheses. These approaches are well established in the social sciences, but require adaptation to the particular needs of business history. The purpose of this article is to argue that opportunities for scientific explanations in business history are enhanced by engagement with the circle of knowledge creation where theory is confronted with empirical evidence and empirical observations feed back into theory formation.",
keywords = "business, history",
author = "{de Jong}, Abe and Higgins, {David Michael} and {van Driel}, Hugo",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00076791.2014.977869",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "5--29",
journal = "Business History",
issn = "0007-6791",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Towards a new business history? / de Jong, Abe; Higgins, David Michael; van Driel, Hugo.

In: Business History, Vol. 57, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 5-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a new business history?

AU - de Jong, Abe

AU - Higgins, David Michael

AU - van Driel, Hugo

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - This article calls for a discussion about business history research. We advocate that the current typical approach in business history – dominantly case study analysis – maintains its prominent position, but the purpose and relevance of this type of research in the scientific method for business history is made more explicit. Moreover, the article proposes the application of additional approaches in business history, which specifically aim to develop theory and test hypotheses. These approaches are well established in the social sciences, but require adaptation to the particular needs of business history. The purpose of this article is to argue that opportunities for scientific explanations in business history are enhanced by engagement with the circle of knowledge creation where theory is confronted with empirical evidence and empirical observations feed back into theory formation.

AB - This article calls for a discussion about business history research. We advocate that the current typical approach in business history – dominantly case study analysis – maintains its prominent position, but the purpose and relevance of this type of research in the scientific method for business history is made more explicit. Moreover, the article proposes the application of additional approaches in business history, which specifically aim to develop theory and test hypotheses. These approaches are well established in the social sciences, but require adaptation to the particular needs of business history. The purpose of this article is to argue that opportunities for scientific explanations in business history are enhanced by engagement with the circle of knowledge creation where theory is confronted with empirical evidence and empirical observations feed back into theory formation.

KW - business

KW - history

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927780416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00076791.2014.977869

DO - 10.1080/00076791.2014.977869

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 5

EP - 29

JO - Business History

JF - Business History

SN - 0007-6791

IS - 1

ER -