TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward best practice in evaluation: a study of Australian health promotion agencies
AU - Francis, Louise Janine
AU - Smith, Benjamin John
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Evaluation makes a critical contribution to the evidence
base for health promotion programs and policy.
Because there has been limited research about the
characteristics and determinants of evaluation practice
in this field, this study audited evaluations completed
by health promotion agencies in Victoria, Australia,
and explored the factors that enabled or hindered
evaluation performance. Twenty-four agencies participated.
A systematic assessment of 29 recent evaluation
reports was undertaken, and in-depth interviews were
carried out with 18 experienced practitioners. There
was wide variability in the scope of evaluations and the
level of reporting undertaken. Formative evaluation
was uncommon, but almost all included process evaluation,
especially of strategy reach and delivery. Impact
evaluation was attempted in the majority of cases, but
the designs and measures used were often not specified.
Practitioners strongly endorsed the importance of
evaluation, but the reporting requirements and inconsistent
administrative procedures of the funding body
were cited as significant barriers. Budget constraints,
employment of untrained coworkers, and lack of access
to measurement tools were other major barriers to
evaluation. Capacity building to strengthen evaluation
needs to encompass system, organizational, and practitioner-
level action. This includes strengthening funding
and reporting arrangements, fostering partnerships,
and tailoring workforce development opportunities for
practitioners.
AB - Evaluation makes a critical contribution to the evidence
base for health promotion programs and policy.
Because there has been limited research about the
characteristics and determinants of evaluation practice
in this field, this study audited evaluations completed
by health promotion agencies in Victoria, Australia,
and explored the factors that enabled or hindered
evaluation performance. Twenty-four agencies participated.
A systematic assessment of 29 recent evaluation
reports was undertaken, and in-depth interviews were
carried out with 18 experienced practitioners. There
was wide variability in the scope of evaluations and the
level of reporting undertaken. Formative evaluation
was uncommon, but almost all included process evaluation,
especially of strategy reach and delivery. Impact
evaluation was attempted in the majority of cases, but
the designs and measures used were often not specified.
Practitioners strongly endorsed the importance of
evaluation, but the reporting requirements and inconsistent
administrative procedures of the funding body
were cited as significant barriers. Budget constraints,
employment of untrained coworkers, and lack of access
to measurement tools were other major barriers to
evaluation. Capacity building to strengthen evaluation
needs to encompass system, organizational, and practitioner-
level action. This includes strengthening funding
and reporting arrangements, fostering partnerships,
and tailoring workforce development opportunities for
practitioners.
UR - http://hpp.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/content/16/5/715.full.pdf+html
U2 - 10.1177/1524839915572574
DO - 10.1177/1524839915572574
M3 - Article
SN - 1524-8399
VL - 16
SP - 715
EP - 723
JO - Health Promotion Practice
JF - Health Promotion Practice
IS - 5
ER -