Touch and feel? Using the rubber hand paradigm to investigate self-touch enhancement in right-hemisphere stroke patients

Rebekah C. White, Anne M.Aimola Davies, Udo Kischka, Martin Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following stroke, a patient may fail to report touch administered by another person but claim that she feels touch when it is self-administered. We investigated three explanations for self-touch enhancement: (1) proprioceptive information from the administering hand, (2) attentional modulation, and (3) temporal expectation. Tactile sensation was assessed with vision precluded, and with the affected hand positioned in the left and right hemispace. In four of six experiments, the somatic rubber hand paradigm was used: the Examiner administered stimulation to the patient's affected left hand while guiding the patient's right hand to administer synchronous stimulation to a prosthetic hand. Even though the patient's two hands were not in contact, patients detected the same number of stimulations as when they touched their own hand directly (self-administered condition). Moreover, there was no decline in rates of detection when potentially informative movements of the administering hand were restricted. This demonstrates that patients feel rather than infer stimulation under conditions of self-touch. When patients received stimulation to the affected hand in the opposite hemispace to the hand administering touch to the prosthetic hand, all but one showed self-touch enhancement. Thus, neither proprioceptive information nor attentional modulation at the spatial region of the administering hand provided a sufficient explanation for self-touch enhancement. A follow-up experiment indicated an important role for temporal expectation: a delay, between the patient's stimulation of the prosthetic hand and the Examiner's stimulation of the patient's affected hand, eliminated the self-touch enhancement effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-37
Number of pages12
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attentional wand
  • Expectation
  • Illusion
  • Proprioception
  • Somatosensory

Cite this

White, Rebekah C. ; Davies, Anne M.Aimola ; Kischka, Udo ; Davies, Martin. / Touch and feel? Using the rubber hand paradigm to investigate self-touch enhancement in right-hemisphere stroke patients. In: Neuropsychologia. 2010 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 26-37.
@article{f28650894ab74f55b630e75f8b8ed723,
title = "Touch and feel? Using the rubber hand paradigm to investigate self-touch enhancement in right-hemisphere stroke patients",
abstract = "Following stroke, a patient may fail to report touch administered by another person but claim that she feels touch when it is self-administered. We investigated three explanations for self-touch enhancement: (1) proprioceptive information from the administering hand, (2) attentional modulation, and (3) temporal expectation. Tactile sensation was assessed with vision precluded, and with the affected hand positioned in the left and right hemispace. In four of six experiments, the somatic rubber hand paradigm was used: the Examiner administered stimulation to the patient's affected left hand while guiding the patient's right hand to administer synchronous stimulation to a prosthetic hand. Even though the patient's two hands were not in contact, patients detected the same number of stimulations as when they touched their own hand directly (self-administered condition). Moreover, there was no decline in rates of detection when potentially informative movements of the administering hand were restricted. This demonstrates that patients feel rather than infer stimulation under conditions of self-touch. When patients received stimulation to the affected hand in the opposite hemispace to the hand administering touch to the prosthetic hand, all but one showed self-touch enhancement. Thus, neither proprioceptive information nor attentional modulation at the spatial region of the administering hand provided a sufficient explanation for self-touch enhancement. A follow-up experiment indicated an important role for temporal expectation: a delay, between the patient's stimulation of the prosthetic hand and the Examiner's stimulation of the patient's affected hand, eliminated the self-touch enhancement effect.",
keywords = "Attentional wand, Expectation, Illusion, Proprioception, Somatosensory",
author = "White, {Rebekah C.} and Davies, {Anne M.Aimola} and Udo Kischka and Martin Davies",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "26--37",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Touch and feel? Using the rubber hand paradigm to investigate self-touch enhancement in right-hemisphere stroke patients. / White, Rebekah C.; Davies, Anne M.Aimola; Kischka, Udo; Davies, Martin.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2010, p. 26-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Touch and feel? Using the rubber hand paradigm to investigate self-touch enhancement in right-hemisphere stroke patients

AU - White, Rebekah C.

AU - Davies, Anne M.Aimola

AU - Kischka, Udo

AU - Davies, Martin

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Following stroke, a patient may fail to report touch administered by another person but claim that she feels touch when it is self-administered. We investigated three explanations for self-touch enhancement: (1) proprioceptive information from the administering hand, (2) attentional modulation, and (3) temporal expectation. Tactile sensation was assessed with vision precluded, and with the affected hand positioned in the left and right hemispace. In four of six experiments, the somatic rubber hand paradigm was used: the Examiner administered stimulation to the patient's affected left hand while guiding the patient's right hand to administer synchronous stimulation to a prosthetic hand. Even though the patient's two hands were not in contact, patients detected the same number of stimulations as when they touched their own hand directly (self-administered condition). Moreover, there was no decline in rates of detection when potentially informative movements of the administering hand were restricted. This demonstrates that patients feel rather than infer stimulation under conditions of self-touch. When patients received stimulation to the affected hand in the opposite hemispace to the hand administering touch to the prosthetic hand, all but one showed self-touch enhancement. Thus, neither proprioceptive information nor attentional modulation at the spatial region of the administering hand provided a sufficient explanation for self-touch enhancement. A follow-up experiment indicated an important role for temporal expectation: a delay, between the patient's stimulation of the prosthetic hand and the Examiner's stimulation of the patient's affected hand, eliminated the self-touch enhancement effect.

AB - Following stroke, a patient may fail to report touch administered by another person but claim that she feels touch when it is self-administered. We investigated three explanations for self-touch enhancement: (1) proprioceptive information from the administering hand, (2) attentional modulation, and (3) temporal expectation. Tactile sensation was assessed with vision precluded, and with the affected hand positioned in the left and right hemispace. In four of six experiments, the somatic rubber hand paradigm was used: the Examiner administered stimulation to the patient's affected left hand while guiding the patient's right hand to administer synchronous stimulation to a prosthetic hand. Even though the patient's two hands were not in contact, patients detected the same number of stimulations as when they touched their own hand directly (self-administered condition). Moreover, there was no decline in rates of detection when potentially informative movements of the administering hand were restricted. This demonstrates that patients feel rather than infer stimulation under conditions of self-touch. When patients received stimulation to the affected hand in the opposite hemispace to the hand administering touch to the prosthetic hand, all but one showed self-touch enhancement. Thus, neither proprioceptive information nor attentional modulation at the spatial region of the administering hand provided a sufficient explanation for self-touch enhancement. A follow-up experiment indicated an important role for temporal expectation: a delay, between the patient's stimulation of the prosthetic hand and the Examiner's stimulation of the patient's affected hand, eliminated the self-touch enhancement effect.

KW - Attentional wand

KW - Expectation

KW - Illusion

KW - Proprioception

KW - Somatosensory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549153790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 26

EP - 37

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 1

ER -