Tools to facilitate communication during physician-patient consultations in cancer care: An overview of systematic reviews

Sharon M. Licqurish, Olivia Y. Cook, Loyal P. Pattuwage, Christobel Saunders, Michael Jefford, Bogda Koczwara, Claire E. Johnson, Jon D. Emery

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Tools have been developed to facilitate communication and support information exchange between people diagnosed with cancer and their physicians. Patient-reported outcome measures, question prompt lists, patient-held records, tape recordings of consultations, decision aids, and survivorship care plans have all been promoted as potential tools, and there is extensive literature exploring their impact on patient outcomes. Eleven systematic reviews of studies evaluating tools to facilitate patient-physician communication were reviewed and summarized in this overview of systematic reviews. Across the systematic reviews, 87 publications reported on 84 primary studies involving 15,381 participants. Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures and feedback of results to clinicians can improve pain management, physician-patient communication, and symptom detection and control; increase utilization of supportive care; and increase patient involvement in care. Question prompt lists can increase the number of questions asked by patients without increasing consultation length and may encourage them to reflect and plan questions before the consultation. There is limited benefit in audio recording consultations or using patient-held records during consultations. Physicians should be supported by adequately resourced health services to respond effectively to the range of clinical and broader patient needs identified through the routine use of tools to facilitate communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-520
Number of pages24
JournalCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume69
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • cancer
  • communication
  • malignancy
  • medicine
  • neoplasm
  • patient
  • patient-reported outcome measures
  • physician
  • referral and consultation
  • systematic review

Cite this

@article{773fb18718424c6ba9a657a0a6dbc560,
title = "Tools to facilitate communication during physician-patient consultations in cancer care: An overview of systematic reviews",
abstract = "Tools have been developed to facilitate communication and support information exchange between people diagnosed with cancer and their physicians. Patient-reported outcome measures, question prompt lists, patient-held records, tape recordings of consultations, decision aids, and survivorship care plans have all been promoted as potential tools, and there is extensive literature exploring their impact on patient outcomes. Eleven systematic reviews of studies evaluating tools to facilitate patient-physician communication were reviewed and summarized in this overview of systematic reviews. Across the systematic reviews, 87 publications reported on 84 primary studies involving 15,381 participants. Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures and feedback of results to clinicians can improve pain management, physician-patient communication, and symptom detection and control; increase utilization of supportive care; and increase patient involvement in care. Question prompt lists can increase the number of questions asked by patients without increasing consultation length and may encourage them to reflect and plan questions before the consultation. There is limited benefit in audio recording consultations or using patient-held records during consultations. Physicians should be supported by adequately resourced health services to respond effectively to the range of clinical and broader patient needs identified through the routine use of tools to facilitate communication.",
keywords = "cancer, communication, malignancy, medicine, neoplasm, patient, patient-reported outcome measures, physician, referral and consultation, systematic review",
author = "Licqurish, {Sharon M.} and Cook, {Olivia Y.} and Pattuwage, {Loyal P.} and Christobel Saunders and Michael Jefford and Bogda Koczwara and Johnson, {Claire E.} and Emery, {Jon D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3322/caac.21573",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "497--520",
journal = "CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians",
issn = "0007-9235",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "6",

}

Tools to facilitate communication during physician-patient consultations in cancer care : An overview of systematic reviews. / Licqurish, Sharon M.; Cook, Olivia Y.; Pattuwage, Loyal P.; Saunders, Christobel; Jefford, Michael; Koczwara, Bogda; Johnson, Claire E.; Emery, Jon D.

In: CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol. 69, No. 6, 11.2019, p. 497-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tools to facilitate communication during physician-patient consultations in cancer care

T2 - An overview of systematic reviews

AU - Licqurish, Sharon M.

AU - Cook, Olivia Y.

AU - Pattuwage, Loyal P.

AU - Saunders, Christobel

AU - Jefford, Michael

AU - Koczwara, Bogda

AU - Johnson, Claire E.

AU - Emery, Jon D.

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Tools have been developed to facilitate communication and support information exchange between people diagnosed with cancer and their physicians. Patient-reported outcome measures, question prompt lists, patient-held records, tape recordings of consultations, decision aids, and survivorship care plans have all been promoted as potential tools, and there is extensive literature exploring their impact on patient outcomes. Eleven systematic reviews of studies evaluating tools to facilitate patient-physician communication were reviewed and summarized in this overview of systematic reviews. Across the systematic reviews, 87 publications reported on 84 primary studies involving 15,381 participants. Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures and feedback of results to clinicians can improve pain management, physician-patient communication, and symptom detection and control; increase utilization of supportive care; and increase patient involvement in care. Question prompt lists can increase the number of questions asked by patients without increasing consultation length and may encourage them to reflect and plan questions before the consultation. There is limited benefit in audio recording consultations or using patient-held records during consultations. Physicians should be supported by adequately resourced health services to respond effectively to the range of clinical and broader patient needs identified through the routine use of tools to facilitate communication.

AB - Tools have been developed to facilitate communication and support information exchange between people diagnosed with cancer and their physicians. Patient-reported outcome measures, question prompt lists, patient-held records, tape recordings of consultations, decision aids, and survivorship care plans have all been promoted as potential tools, and there is extensive literature exploring their impact on patient outcomes. Eleven systematic reviews of studies evaluating tools to facilitate patient-physician communication were reviewed and summarized in this overview of systematic reviews. Across the systematic reviews, 87 publications reported on 84 primary studies involving 15,381 participants. Routine use of patient-reported outcome measures and feedback of results to clinicians can improve pain management, physician-patient communication, and symptom detection and control; increase utilization of supportive care; and increase patient involvement in care. Question prompt lists can increase the number of questions asked by patients without increasing consultation length and may encourage them to reflect and plan questions before the consultation. There is limited benefit in audio recording consultations or using patient-held records during consultations. Physicians should be supported by adequately resourced health services to respond effectively to the range of clinical and broader patient needs identified through the routine use of tools to facilitate communication.

KW - cancer

KW - communication

KW - malignancy

KW - medicine

KW - neoplasm

KW - patient

KW - patient-reported outcome measures

KW - physician

KW - referral and consultation

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069802308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3322/caac.21573

DO - 10.3322/caac.21573

M3 - Review Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069802308

VL - 69

SP - 497

EP - 520

JO - CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

JF - CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

SN - 0007-9235

IS - 6

ER -