Tolerability of accelerated chest irradiation and impact on survival of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Review of a single institution's experience

Michael Ng, Jennifer Chong, Alvin Milner, Michael MacManus, Greg Wheeler, A Wirth, Michael Michael, Vinod Ganju, Joseph McKendrick, David L Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence that has been published in the last decade indicates that in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic radiotherapy (RT) given twice daily and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) have each separately improved survival. Concerns about the toxicities associated with these treatments and uncertainty about their impact on survival outside the trial setting may have restricted the extent to which they have been incorporated into standard treatment protocols. We have reviewed the experience at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre to determine the tolerability of these treatments in routine practice and to determine their effects on survival. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with limited-stage SCLC receiving a radical course of thoracic RT between June 1998 and May 2002, including either conventional fractionation at 50 Gy for 5 weeks, or hyperfractionated accelerated RT at 45 Gy for 3 weeks. Patients achieving a complete response were offered PCI at 36 Gy in 18 fractions. The main outcomes recorded were RT toxicity (graded using CTCAE v. 3.0 and RTOG/EORTC late scoring criteria), response, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Ninety patients were identified as having undergone radical-intent thoracic RT, with a median potential follow-up of 4.2 years. Fifty-seven patients (63 ) were treated with hyperfractionated accelerated RT, and 33 (37 ) were treated with conventional fractionation. Forty-six patients (51 ) received PCI. Patients receiving hyperfractionated accelerated RT compared with conventional fractionation had higher rates of grade 3 and 4 esophagitis (14 versus 6 ; p = 0.312), a higher rate of treatment interruptions (12 versus 3 ; p = 0.250), and a higher hospital admission rate (39 versus 15 ; p = 0.031). The .......
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)506 - 513
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
Volume2
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this