To cool, but not too cool

That is the question-immersion cooling for hyperthermia

Nigel A S Taylor, Joanne N. Caldwell, Anne M J Van Den Heuvel, Mark J. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Patient cooling time can impact upon the prognosis of heat illness. Although ice-cold-water immersion will rapidly extract heat, access to ice or cold water may be limited in hot climates. Indeed, some have concerns regarding the sudden cold-water immersion of hyperthermic individuals, whereas others believe that cutaneous vasoconstriction may reduce convective heat transfer from the core. It was hypothesized that warmer immersion temperatures, which induce less powerful vasoconstriction, may still facilitate rapid cooling in hyperthermic individuals. Methods: Eight males participated in three trials and were heated to an esophageal temperature of 39.5°C by exercising in the heat (36°C, 50% relative humidity) while wearing a water-perfusion garment (40-C). Subjects were cooled using each of the following methods: air (20-22°C), cold-water immersion (14°C), and temperate-water immersion (26°C). Results: The time to reach an esophageal temperature of 37.5°C averaged 22.81 min (air), 2.16 min (cold), and 2.91 min (temperate). Whereas each of the between-trial comparisons was statistically significant (P < 0.05), cooling in temperate water took only marginally longer than that in cold water, and one cannot imagine that the 45-s cooling time difference would have any meaningful physiological or clinical implications. Conclusion: It is assumed that this rapid heat loss was due to a less powerful peripheral vasoconstrictor response, with central heat being more rapidly transported to the skin surface for dissipation. Although the core-to-water thermal gradient was much smaller with temperate-water cooling, greater skin and deeper tissue blood flows would support a superior convective heat delivery. Thus, a sustained physiological mechanism (blood flow) appears to have countered a less powerful thermal gradient, resulting in clinically insignificant differences in heat extraction between the cold and temperate cooling trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1962-1969
Number of pages8
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cold-water immersion
  • Esophageal temperature
  • Heat illness
  • Whole-body cooling

Cite this

Taylor, Nigel A S ; Caldwell, Joanne N. ; Heuvel, Anne M J Van Den ; Patterson, Mark J. / To cool, but not too cool : That is the question-immersion cooling for hyperthermia. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 11. pp. 1962-1969.
@article{6d9337936ec1404f8a5689e57ca72afd,
title = "To cool, but not too cool: That is the question-immersion cooling for hyperthermia",
abstract = "Introduction: Patient cooling time can impact upon the prognosis of heat illness. Although ice-cold-water immersion will rapidly extract heat, access to ice or cold water may be limited in hot climates. Indeed, some have concerns regarding the sudden cold-water immersion of hyperthermic individuals, whereas others believe that cutaneous vasoconstriction may reduce convective heat transfer from the core. It was hypothesized that warmer immersion temperatures, which induce less powerful vasoconstriction, may still facilitate rapid cooling in hyperthermic individuals. Methods: Eight males participated in three trials and were heated to an esophageal temperature of 39.5°C by exercising in the heat (36°C, 50{\%} relative humidity) while wearing a water-perfusion garment (40-C). Subjects were cooled using each of the following methods: air (20-22°C), cold-water immersion (14°C), and temperate-water immersion (26°C). Results: The time to reach an esophageal temperature of 37.5°C averaged 22.81 min (air), 2.16 min (cold), and 2.91 min (temperate). Whereas each of the between-trial comparisons was statistically significant (P < 0.05), cooling in temperate water took only marginally longer than that in cold water, and one cannot imagine that the 45-s cooling time difference would have any meaningful physiological or clinical implications. Conclusion: It is assumed that this rapid heat loss was due to a less powerful peripheral vasoconstrictor response, with central heat being more rapidly transported to the skin surface for dissipation. Although the core-to-water thermal gradient was much smaller with temperate-water cooling, greater skin and deeper tissue blood flows would support a superior convective heat delivery. Thus, a sustained physiological mechanism (blood flow) appears to have countered a less powerful thermal gradient, resulting in clinically insignificant differences in heat extraction between the cold and temperate cooling trials.",
keywords = "Cold-water immersion, Esophageal temperature, Heat illness, Whole-body cooling",
author = "Taylor, {Nigel A S} and Caldwell, {Joanne N.} and Heuvel, {Anne M J Van Den} and Patterson, {Mark J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817eee9d",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1962--1969",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "American College of Sports Medicine",
number = "11",

}

To cool, but not too cool : That is the question-immersion cooling for hyperthermia. / Taylor, Nigel A S; Caldwell, Joanne N.; Heuvel, Anne M J Van Den; Patterson, Mark J.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 40, No. 11, 11.2008, p. 1962-1969.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - To cool, but not too cool

T2 - That is the question-immersion cooling for hyperthermia

AU - Taylor, Nigel A S

AU - Caldwell, Joanne N.

AU - Heuvel, Anne M J Van Den

AU - Patterson, Mark J.

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Introduction: Patient cooling time can impact upon the prognosis of heat illness. Although ice-cold-water immersion will rapidly extract heat, access to ice or cold water may be limited in hot climates. Indeed, some have concerns regarding the sudden cold-water immersion of hyperthermic individuals, whereas others believe that cutaneous vasoconstriction may reduce convective heat transfer from the core. It was hypothesized that warmer immersion temperatures, which induce less powerful vasoconstriction, may still facilitate rapid cooling in hyperthermic individuals. Methods: Eight males participated in three trials and were heated to an esophageal temperature of 39.5°C by exercising in the heat (36°C, 50% relative humidity) while wearing a water-perfusion garment (40-C). Subjects were cooled using each of the following methods: air (20-22°C), cold-water immersion (14°C), and temperate-water immersion (26°C). Results: The time to reach an esophageal temperature of 37.5°C averaged 22.81 min (air), 2.16 min (cold), and 2.91 min (temperate). Whereas each of the between-trial comparisons was statistically significant (P < 0.05), cooling in temperate water took only marginally longer than that in cold water, and one cannot imagine that the 45-s cooling time difference would have any meaningful physiological or clinical implications. Conclusion: It is assumed that this rapid heat loss was due to a less powerful peripheral vasoconstrictor response, with central heat being more rapidly transported to the skin surface for dissipation. Although the core-to-water thermal gradient was much smaller with temperate-water cooling, greater skin and deeper tissue blood flows would support a superior convective heat delivery. Thus, a sustained physiological mechanism (blood flow) appears to have countered a less powerful thermal gradient, resulting in clinically insignificant differences in heat extraction between the cold and temperate cooling trials.

AB - Introduction: Patient cooling time can impact upon the prognosis of heat illness. Although ice-cold-water immersion will rapidly extract heat, access to ice or cold water may be limited in hot climates. Indeed, some have concerns regarding the sudden cold-water immersion of hyperthermic individuals, whereas others believe that cutaneous vasoconstriction may reduce convective heat transfer from the core. It was hypothesized that warmer immersion temperatures, which induce less powerful vasoconstriction, may still facilitate rapid cooling in hyperthermic individuals. Methods: Eight males participated in three trials and were heated to an esophageal temperature of 39.5°C by exercising in the heat (36°C, 50% relative humidity) while wearing a water-perfusion garment (40-C). Subjects were cooled using each of the following methods: air (20-22°C), cold-water immersion (14°C), and temperate-water immersion (26°C). Results: The time to reach an esophageal temperature of 37.5°C averaged 22.81 min (air), 2.16 min (cold), and 2.91 min (temperate). Whereas each of the between-trial comparisons was statistically significant (P < 0.05), cooling in temperate water took only marginally longer than that in cold water, and one cannot imagine that the 45-s cooling time difference would have any meaningful physiological or clinical implications. Conclusion: It is assumed that this rapid heat loss was due to a less powerful peripheral vasoconstrictor response, with central heat being more rapidly transported to the skin surface for dissipation. Although the core-to-water thermal gradient was much smaller with temperate-water cooling, greater skin and deeper tissue blood flows would support a superior convective heat delivery. Thus, a sustained physiological mechanism (blood flow) appears to have countered a less powerful thermal gradient, resulting in clinically insignificant differences in heat extraction between the cold and temperate cooling trials.

KW - Cold-water immersion

KW - Esophageal temperature

KW - Heat illness

KW - Whole-body cooling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66949142211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817eee9d

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817eee9d

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1962

EP - 1969

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 11

ER -