TY - JOUR
T1 - Time to Renal Replacement Therapy Initiation in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury
T2 - A Secondary Analysis of the Standard Versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) Trial
AU - Jeong, Rachel
AU - Bagshaw, Sean M.
AU - Ghamarian, Ehsan
AU - Harvey, Andrea
AU - Joannidis, Michael
AU - Kirkham, Brian
AU - Mcauley, Daniel F.
AU - Ostermann, Marlies
AU - Quenot, Jean Pierre
AU - Young, Paul J.
AU - Wald, Ron
AU - on behalf of the STandard vs. Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) Investigators
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Objectives: Among critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) who lack emergent indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT), a strategy of preemptive RRT initiation does not lead to improved outcomes. However, for patients with persistent AKI and without urgent indications for RRT, the safety of prolonged delays in RRT initiation is unclear. We sought to assess the association between progressively longer delays in RRT initiation and clinical outcomes. Design: A post hoc secondary analysis. Setting: The multinational STandard vs. Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) trial. Patients: Participants allocated to the standard strategy of the STARRT-AKI trial. Interventions: The exposure was time from randomization to RRT initiation, evaluated in quartiles and as a continuous variable. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were RRT dependence, RRT-free days, and hospital-free days, all at 90 days, as well length of ICU and hospital stay. Of the 1462 participants allocated to the standard strategy group, 903 (62%) received RRT. Median time (interquartile range) to RRT initiation was 12.1 hours (8.3-13.8 hr), 24.5 hours (21.8-26.5 hr), 46.8 hours (35.2-52.1 hr), and 96.1 hours (76.7-139.2 hr) in quartiles 1-4, respectively. Prolonged time to RRT initiation was associated with a lower risk of death at 90 days (quartile 4 vs. 1: adjusted odds ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.42-0.94]); further analyses using cubic splines and inverse probability weighting to account for immortal time bias showed no association with the risk of death. There was no association between time to RRT initiation and RRT-free days, hospital-free days, or lengths of ICU or hospital stay. Longer delay to RRT initiation had a linear association with RRT dependence at 90 days. Conclusions: Among patients with no urgent indications and who received RRT in the standard strategy of the STARRT-AKI trial, longer deferral of RRT initiation was not associated with a higher risk of mortality.
AB - Objectives: Among critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) who lack emergent indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT), a strategy of preemptive RRT initiation does not lead to improved outcomes. However, for patients with persistent AKI and without urgent indications for RRT, the safety of prolonged delays in RRT initiation is unclear. We sought to assess the association between progressively longer delays in RRT initiation and clinical outcomes. Design: A post hoc secondary analysis. Setting: The multinational STandard vs. Accelerated initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury (STARRT-AKI) trial. Patients: Participants allocated to the standard strategy of the STARRT-AKI trial. Interventions: The exposure was time from randomization to RRT initiation, evaluated in quartiles and as a continuous variable. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were RRT dependence, RRT-free days, and hospital-free days, all at 90 days, as well length of ICU and hospital stay. Of the 1462 participants allocated to the standard strategy group, 903 (62%) received RRT. Median time (interquartile range) to RRT initiation was 12.1 hours (8.3-13.8 hr), 24.5 hours (21.8-26.5 hr), 46.8 hours (35.2-52.1 hr), and 96.1 hours (76.7-139.2 hr) in quartiles 1-4, respectively. Prolonged time to RRT initiation was associated with a lower risk of death at 90 days (quartile 4 vs. 1: adjusted odds ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.42-0.94]); further analyses using cubic splines and inverse probability weighting to account for immortal time bias showed no association with the risk of death. There was no association between time to RRT initiation and RRT-free days, hospital-free days, or lengths of ICU or hospital stay. Longer delay to RRT initiation had a linear association with RRT dependence at 90 days. Conclusions: Among patients with no urgent indications and who received RRT in the standard strategy of the STARRT-AKI trial, longer deferral of RRT initiation was not associated with a higher risk of mortality.
KW - acute kidney injury
KW - critical care
KW - dialysis
KW - renal replacement therapy
KW - timing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/86000321061
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006616
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006616
M3 - Article
C2 - 40029115
AN - SCOPUS:86000321061
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 53
SP - e897-e907
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 4
ER -