Time and interpretation in Heraclitus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Researchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reading the Heraclitean fragments after Heidegger is a daunting if perhaps impossible task. Furthermore the complexity of Heidegger’s repeated return to Heraclitus, almost independently of its forming a fundamental part of the development of his own philosophy, poses the problem of how to take a stand in relation to it. Perhaps a way into the problem could start from a consideration of the conception of language Heidegger deploys in his reading. I must indicate that in order to give this chapter a specific focus I have limited myself to a discussion of his 1953 text An Introduction to Metaphysics.* Heidegger emerges as an important detour on the way to developing an interpretation of Heraclitus. It is however a detour that must be made.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPost-Structuralist Classics
EditorsAndrew Benjamin
Place of PublicationLondon UK
PublisherRoutledge
Pages106-131
Number of pages26
Volume5
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315537597
ISBN (Print)9781138689510
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1988

Cite this