Thinking about critical thinking: An industry perspective

Alastair Owen Pearl, Gerry M. Rayner, Ian Larson, Laurence Orlando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There has been a drive towards enhancing the critical thinking (CT) skills development of students in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, both in Australia and internationally. One debate among CT theorists centres on whether CT comprises a set of generalizable skills or is content- and context-dependent. While previous studies have considered CT skills development and its assessment in pharmacy courses, there appears to have been limited scholarly research within the pharmaceutical sciences discipline. In seeking to address this, it is vital to understand how companies conceptualize CT and its use by Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Sciences graduates. This research identifies five major categories used to conceptualize CT in the companies interviewed: being systematic, having strong business sense, considering multiple solutions, considering implications and identifying problems and potential solutions. The study finds that, while these skills are dependent on the business context, they may be generalizable across a range of industries.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalIndustry and Higher Education
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Critical thinking
  • employability
  • industry
  • stakeholder groups
  • STEM education

Cite this

@article{0e1681dfbe5d49b6b6e5a717747488b1,
title = "Thinking about critical thinking: An industry perspective",
abstract = "There has been a drive towards enhancing the critical thinking (CT) skills development of students in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, both in Australia and internationally. One debate among CT theorists centres on whether CT comprises a set of generalizable skills or is content- and context-dependent. While previous studies have considered CT skills development and its assessment in pharmacy courses, there appears to have been limited scholarly research within the pharmaceutical sciences discipline. In seeking to address this, it is vital to understand how companies conceptualize CT and its use by Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Sciences graduates. This research identifies five major categories used to conceptualize CT in the companies interviewed: being systematic, having strong business sense, considering multiple solutions, considering implications and identifying problems and potential solutions. The study finds that, while these skills are dependent on the business context, they may be generalizable across a range of industries.",
keywords = "Critical thinking, employability, industry, stakeholder groups, STEM education",
author = "Pearl, {Alastair Owen} and Rayner, {Gerry M.} and Ian Larson and Laurence Orlando",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0950422218796099",
language = "English",
journal = "Industry and Higher Education",
issn = "0950-4222",
publisher = "IP Publishing",

}

Thinking about critical thinking : An industry perspective. / Pearl, Alastair Owen; Rayner, Gerry M.; Larson, Ian; Orlando, Laurence.

In: Industry and Higher Education, 02.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking about critical thinking

T2 - An industry perspective

AU - Pearl, Alastair Owen

AU - Rayner, Gerry M.

AU - Larson, Ian

AU - Orlando, Laurence

PY - 2018/9/2

Y1 - 2018/9/2

N2 - There has been a drive towards enhancing the critical thinking (CT) skills development of students in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, both in Australia and internationally. One debate among CT theorists centres on whether CT comprises a set of generalizable skills or is content- and context-dependent. While previous studies have considered CT skills development and its assessment in pharmacy courses, there appears to have been limited scholarly research within the pharmaceutical sciences discipline. In seeking to address this, it is vital to understand how companies conceptualize CT and its use by Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Sciences graduates. This research identifies five major categories used to conceptualize CT in the companies interviewed: being systematic, having strong business sense, considering multiple solutions, considering implications and identifying problems and potential solutions. The study finds that, while these skills are dependent on the business context, they may be generalizable across a range of industries.

AB - There has been a drive towards enhancing the critical thinking (CT) skills development of students in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines, both in Australia and internationally. One debate among CT theorists centres on whether CT comprises a set of generalizable skills or is content- and context-dependent. While previous studies have considered CT skills development and its assessment in pharmacy courses, there appears to have been limited scholarly research within the pharmaceutical sciences discipline. In seeking to address this, it is vital to understand how companies conceptualize CT and its use by Bachelor of Pharmaceutical Sciences graduates. This research identifies five major categories used to conceptualize CT in the companies interviewed: being systematic, having strong business sense, considering multiple solutions, considering implications and identifying problems and potential solutions. The study finds that, while these skills are dependent on the business context, they may be generalizable across a range of industries.

KW - Critical thinking

KW - employability

KW - industry

KW - stakeholder groups

KW - STEM education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053378246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0950422218796099

DO - 10.1177/0950422218796099

M3 - Article

JO - Industry and Higher Education

JF - Industry and Higher Education

SN - 0950-4222

ER -