TY - JOUR
T1 - Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb
T2 - A semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients
AU - Talelli, Penelop E.
AU - Wallace, Amanda
AU - Dileone, Michelle
AU - Hoad, Damon
AU - Cheeran, Binith
AU - Oliver, Rupert
AU - Vandenbos, Mehdi
AU - Hammerbeck, Ulrike
AU - Barratt, Karen
AU - Gillini, Cecilia
AU - Musumeci, Gabriella
AU - Boudrias, Marie Hélène
AU - Cloud, Geoffrey C.
AU - Ball, Joanna
AU - Marsden, Jonathan F.
AU - Ward, Nicholas S.
AU - Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
AU - Greenwood, Richard G.
AU - Rothwell, John C.
PY - 2012/10
Y1 - 2012/10
N2 - Background. Noninvasive cortical stimulation could represent an add-on treatment to enhance motor recovery after stroke. However, its clinical value, including anticipated size and duration of the treatment effects, remains largely unknown. Objective. The authors designed a small semi-randomized clinical trial to explore whether long-lasting clinically important gains can be achieved by adding theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to a rehabilitation program for the hand. Methods. A total of 41 chronic stroke patients received excitatory TBS to the ipsilesional hemisphere or inhibitory TBS to the contralesional hemisphere in 2 centers; each active group was compared with a group receiving sham TBS. TBS was followed by physical therapy for 10 working days. Patients and therapists were blinded to the type of TBS. Primary outcome measures (9-hole Peg Test [9HPT], Jebsen Taylor Test [JTT], and grip and pinch-grip dynamometry) were assessed 4, 30, and 90 days post treatment. The clinically important difference was defined as 10% of the maximum score. Results. There were no differences between the active treatment and sham groups in any of the outcome measures. All patients achieved small sustainable improvements-9HPT, 5% of maximum (confidence interval [CI] = 3%-7%); JTT, 5.7% (CI = 3%-8%); and grip strength, 6% (CI = 2%-10%)-all below the defined clinically important level. Conclusions. Cortical stimulation did not augment the gains from a late rehabilitation program. The effect size anticipated by the authors was overestimated. These results can improve the design of future work on therapeutic uses of TMS.
AB - Background. Noninvasive cortical stimulation could represent an add-on treatment to enhance motor recovery after stroke. However, its clinical value, including anticipated size and duration of the treatment effects, remains largely unknown. Objective. The authors designed a small semi-randomized clinical trial to explore whether long-lasting clinically important gains can be achieved by adding theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to a rehabilitation program for the hand. Methods. A total of 41 chronic stroke patients received excitatory TBS to the ipsilesional hemisphere or inhibitory TBS to the contralesional hemisphere in 2 centers; each active group was compared with a group receiving sham TBS. TBS was followed by physical therapy for 10 working days. Patients and therapists were blinded to the type of TBS. Primary outcome measures (9-hole Peg Test [9HPT], Jebsen Taylor Test [JTT], and grip and pinch-grip dynamometry) were assessed 4, 30, and 90 days post treatment. The clinically important difference was defined as 10% of the maximum score. Results. There were no differences between the active treatment and sham groups in any of the outcome measures. All patients achieved small sustainable improvements-9HPT, 5% of maximum (confidence interval [CI] = 3%-7%); JTT, 5.7% (CI = 3%-8%); and grip strength, 6% (CI = 2%-10%)-all below the defined clinically important level. Conclusions. Cortical stimulation did not augment the gains from a late rehabilitation program. The effect size anticipated by the authors was overestimated. These results can improve the design of future work on therapeutic uses of TMS.
KW - motor control
KW - stroke rehabilitation
KW - theta burst stimulation
KW - transcranial magnetic stimulation
KW - upper extremity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866303576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1545968312437940
DO - 10.1177/1545968312437940
M3 - Article
C2 - 22412171
AN - SCOPUS:84866303576
SN - 1545-9683
VL - 26
SP - 976
EP - 987
JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
IS - 8
ER -