TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermal Challenges in Dynamic Infrared Thermography used for Perforator Mapping
AU - Lin, Olivia M.
AU - Hunter-Smith, David J.
AU - Rozen, Warren Matthew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the different approaches to thermal challenges, both cold and warm, used in dynamic infrared thermography for reconstructive surgery, and explore whether it affects the success of preoperative perforator mapping. Material and Methods: Literature was collected from OVID Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane. The references of the full-text articles located from the original search were also appraised. Thirteen articles were extracted for the final qualitative analysis. A systematic review was then conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Thirteen articles looked at a cold challenge, which included airflow cooling, direct contact cooling and evaporative based cooling. Two articles investigated warm challenges. One paper used no challenge, suggesting it unnecessary with a highly sensitive camera. All cold challenges were positively supported by a high level of flap perfusion success, and/or a high level of correlation with other forms of investigation. Conclusions: Cold challenges were overall superior to no challenge and warm challenges; however, this conclusion is limited by the small participant size, the possibility of detection bias, and poor methodology detailing. Airflow cooling-specifically, using a desktop fan to blow air for two minutes-was noted to likely cause the least discomfort due to a low cooling capacity yet simultaneously maintain effectiveness and allow for a uniform cooling application. Warm challenges showed less conclusive results and were restricted by lack of studies. This topic would benefit from larger scale studies that compare multiple approaches whilst using standardized equipment to eliminate confounding factors.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the different approaches to thermal challenges, both cold and warm, used in dynamic infrared thermography for reconstructive surgery, and explore whether it affects the success of preoperative perforator mapping. Material and Methods: Literature was collected from OVID Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane. The references of the full-text articles located from the original search were also appraised. Thirteen articles were extracted for the final qualitative analysis. A systematic review was then conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Thirteen articles looked at a cold challenge, which included airflow cooling, direct contact cooling and evaporative based cooling. Two articles investigated warm challenges. One paper used no challenge, suggesting it unnecessary with a highly sensitive camera. All cold challenges were positively supported by a high level of flap perfusion success, and/or a high level of correlation with other forms of investigation. Conclusions: Cold challenges were overall superior to no challenge and warm challenges; however, this conclusion is limited by the small participant size, the possibility of detection bias, and poor methodology detailing. Airflow cooling-specifically, using a desktop fan to blow air for two minutes-was noted to likely cause the least discomfort due to a low cooling capacity yet simultaneously maintain effectiveness and allow for a uniform cooling application. Warm challenges showed less conclusive results and were restricted by lack of studies. This topic would benefit from larger scale studies that compare multiple approaches whilst using standardized equipment to eliminate confounding factors.
KW - dynamic infrared thermography
KW - perforator mapping
KW - surgery
KW - thermal challenge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169061471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/a-2153-4552
DO - 10.1055/a-2153-4552
M3 - Article
C2 - 37579783
AN - SCOPUS:85169061471
SN - 0743-684X
VL - 40
SP - 268
EP - 275
JO - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
JF - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
IS - 4
ER -