Abstract
Theories of autonomy commonly make reference to some form of endorsement: an action is autonomous insofar as the agent has a second-order desire towards the motivating desire, or takes it to be a reason for action, or is not alienated from it. In this paper I argue that all such theories have difficulty accounting for certain kinds of agents, what I call 'Woody Allen cases'. In order to make sense of such cases, I suggest, it is necessary to disambiguate two distinct forms of endorsement, both of which contribute to autonomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 729-747 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Nous |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver