Abstract
This essay discusses some of the ways in which De iure praedae may be understood to constitute a republican text. It is my argument that the 'Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty' should be fi rmly located within the over-arching republican discourse of the juvenilia, although the text's republican content is not immediately apparent. On close examination, a republican sub-text is detectible through the author's treatment of the discursive object of the text, the Dutch East India Company (the VOC), a corporate body. By attempting to legitimate the VOC's natural right to wage just war, Grotius invests a private entity with a public mark of sovereignty. This investiture of a non-state actor with public international legal personality forces a careful reappraisal of two central characteristics of seventeenth-century republican thought: (i) the divisibility of sovereignty, and (ii) the fl uid demarcation between the 'public' and the 'private' spheres. I conclude that the VOC may be accurately denoted a 'corporate sovereign', an entity whose legal personality is derived from the corporatist principles that underlined early republican and federalist theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Property, Piracy and Punishment: Hugo Grotius on War and Booty in De iure praedae - Concepts and Contexts |
| Editors | Hans W Blom |
| Place of Publication | Netherlands |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Pages | 310-340 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789004175136 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
Keywords
- Capitalist world-economy
- corporate sovereignty
- Corporatism
- Divisible sovereignty
- Dominium
- Giovanni aArrighi
- Imperium
- Jean bodin
- Johannes althusius
- Modern world-system
- Occupatio duplex
- Republicanism
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver