TY - JOUR
T1 - The Value of Programmatic Assessment in Supporting Educators and Students to Succeed
T2 - A Qualitative Evaluation
AU - Dart, Janeane
AU - Twohig, Cliona
AU - Anderson, Amanda
AU - Bryce, Andrea
AU - Collins, Jorja
AU - Gibson, Simone
AU - Kleve, Sue
AU - Porter, Judi
AU - Volders, Evelyn
AU - Palermo, Claire
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Background: Programmatic assessment has been proposed as the way forward for competency-based assessment, yet there is a dearth of literature describing the implementation and evaluation of programmatic assessment approaches. Objective: To evaluate the implementation of a programmatic assessment and explore its ability to support students and assessors. Design: A qualitative evaluation of programmatic assessment was employed. Participants/setting: Interviews with graduates (n = 8) and preceptors (n = 12) together with focus groups with faculty assessors (n = 9) from the one Australian university explored experiences of the programmatic approach, role of assessment in learning, and defensibility of assessment decisions in determining competence. Analysis performed: Data were analyzed into key themes using framework analysis. Results: The programmatic assessment increased confidence in defensibility of assessment decisions, reduced emotional burden of assessment, increased value of assessment, and identified and remediated at-risk students earlier when philosophical and practice shifts in approaches to assessment were embraced. Conclusions: Programmatic assessment supports a holistic approach to competency development and assessment and has multiple benefits for learners and assessors.
AB - Background: Programmatic assessment has been proposed as the way forward for competency-based assessment, yet there is a dearth of literature describing the implementation and evaluation of programmatic assessment approaches. Objective: To evaluate the implementation of a programmatic assessment and explore its ability to support students and assessors. Design: A qualitative evaluation of programmatic assessment was employed. Participants/setting: Interviews with graduates (n = 8) and preceptors (n = 12) together with focus groups with faculty assessors (n = 9) from the one Australian university explored experiences of the programmatic approach, role of assessment in learning, and defensibility of assessment decisions in determining competence. Analysis performed: Data were analyzed into key themes using framework analysis. Results: The programmatic assessment increased confidence in defensibility of assessment decisions, reduced emotional burden of assessment, increased value of assessment, and identified and remediated at-risk students earlier when philosophical and practice shifts in approaches to assessment were embraced. Conclusions: Programmatic assessment supports a holistic approach to competency development and assessment and has multiple benefits for learners and assessors.
KW - Education
KW - Evaluation of learning
KW - Programmatic assessment
KW - Work-based assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101410007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2021.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2021.01.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 33612437
AN - SCOPUS:85101410007
SN - 2212-2672
VL - 121
SP - 1732
EP - 1740
JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
IS - 9
ER -