Abstract
Schinka, Kinder, and Kremer developed "validity" scales for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae) to detect underreporting-the Positive Presentation Management (PPM) Scale and overreporting-the Negative Presentation Management (NPM) Scale. In this investigation, the clinical utility of these scales was examined using the established validity scales from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher et al.) as the referent. The sample was composed of 370 psychiatric patients who completed the NEO PI-R and the MMPI-2 as part of a routine evaluation. Results indicated that response distortion compromised the utility of the NEO PI-R domain scales. Moreover, the PPM and NPM scales and an NPM-PPM index significantly differentiated invalid under-and overreporting groups from a valid responding group. The PPM and NPM-PPM index were adequate in classifying under- and overreporters, respectively.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 165-176 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Assessment |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- MMPI-2
- NEO PI-R
- Overreporting
- Response bias
- Underreporting
- Validity scales
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver