TY - JOUR
T1 - The validity and reliability of the occupational contact dermatitis disease severity index
AU - Curr, Nathan
AU - Dharmage, Shyamali
AU - Keegel, Tessa
AU - Lee, Adriene
AU - Saunders, Helen
AU - Nixon, Rosemary
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Background: The occupational contact dermatitis disease severity index (ODDI) was designed to
assess the severity and importantly the functional disability caused by occupational contact dermatitis
(OCD) of the hands in patients attending our occupational dermatology clinic.
Objectives: To investigate the accuracy of the ODDI.
Patients/Methods: Of 205 patients, 95 were assessed as having OCD of the hands. Content validity
was assessed by content mapping and expert opinion. Construct validity was examined through
comparing the ODDI against global clinical dermatology severity assessment (GCDSA). Intraobserver
reliability, interobserver reliability, internal consistency, acceptability and convenience were
also assessed.
Results: The ODDI was found to have content validity by the experts and was moderately correlated
with GCDSA, supporting construct validity (Pearsona??s r A? 0.54; P 0.01). The ODDI was shown
to be reliable with substantial agreement for both intraobserver reliability [intraclass correlation
coefficient (ICC) A? 0.62] and interobserver reliability (ICC A? 0.75). Internal consistency within
the ODDI was almost perfect (ICC A? 0.94a??0.99) and user survey showed the ODDI to be acceptable,
easy and quick to use.
Conclusions: The ODDI is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the severity and functional
limitations caused by OCD, in patients who have had treatment or modified work duties, associated
with some improvement of their dermatitis.
AB - Background: The occupational contact dermatitis disease severity index (ODDI) was designed to
assess the severity and importantly the functional disability caused by occupational contact dermatitis
(OCD) of the hands in patients attending our occupational dermatology clinic.
Objectives: To investigate the accuracy of the ODDI.
Patients/Methods: Of 205 patients, 95 were assessed as having OCD of the hands. Content validity
was assessed by content mapping and expert opinion. Construct validity was examined through
comparing the ODDI against global clinical dermatology severity assessment (GCDSA). Intraobserver
reliability, interobserver reliability, internal consistency, acceptability and convenience were
also assessed.
Results: The ODDI was found to have content validity by the experts and was moderately correlated
with GCDSA, supporting construct validity (Pearsona??s r A? 0.54; P 0.01). The ODDI was shown
to be reliable with substantial agreement for both intraobserver reliability [intraclass correlation
coefficient (ICC) A? 0.62] and interobserver reliability (ICC A? 0.75). Internal consistency within
the ODDI was almost perfect (ICC A? 0.94a??0.99) and user survey showed the ODDI to be acceptable,
easy and quick to use.
Conclusions: The ODDI is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the severity and functional
limitations caused by OCD, in patients who have had treatment or modified work duties, associated
with some improvement of their dermatitis.
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01404.x/pdf
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01404.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01404.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0105-1873
VL - 59
SP - 157
EP - 164
JO - Contact Dermatitis
JF - Contact Dermatitis
IS - 3
ER -