TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility of internal spinal marking for intraoperative localisation
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Tan, Darius
AU - Castle-Kirszbaum, Mendel
AU - Mariajoseph, Frederick P.
AU - Kow, Chien Yew
AU - Ho, Ben
AU - Danks, Andrew
AU - Goldschlager, Tony
AU - Kam, Jeremy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Background: Incorrect level spinal surgery is an avoidable complication, with significant ramifications. Several pre-operative spinal marking techniques have been described to aid intraoperative localisation. Methods: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed from inception to July 2022. All publications describing cases of internal spinal marking were included for further analysis. 22 articles describing 503 patients satisfied our eligibility criteria. Results: A number of localisation techniques, including endovascular coiling (n = 16), fiducials (n = 177), dye (n = 109), needle/fixed wire (n = 199), cement (n = 4), and gadolinium tubes (n = 1) were described. The highest rates of technical success were observed with endovascular coiling, fiducials, cement and dye (100 %), and complication rates were lowest with endovascular coiling, fiducials and cement (0 %). Conclusions: Overall, internal spinal marking was effective and safe. When considering practicality and efficacy, fiducial marking appears the optimal technique, as it can be performed in the outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. This review demonstrates the need for more targeted investigation into localisation methods in spinal surgery.
AB - Background: Incorrect level spinal surgery is an avoidable complication, with significant ramifications. Several pre-operative spinal marking techniques have been described to aid intraoperative localisation. Methods: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE was performed from inception to July 2022. All publications describing cases of internal spinal marking were included for further analysis. 22 articles describing 503 patients satisfied our eligibility criteria. Results: A number of localisation techniques, including endovascular coiling (n = 16), fiducials (n = 177), dye (n = 109), needle/fixed wire (n = 199), cement (n = 4), and gadolinium tubes (n = 1) were described. The highest rates of technical success were observed with endovascular coiling, fiducials, cement and dye (100 %), and complication rates were lowest with endovascular coiling, fiducials and cement (0 %). Conclusions: Overall, internal spinal marking was effective and safe. When considering practicality and efficacy, fiducial marking appears the optimal technique, as it can be performed in the outpatient setting under local anaesthesia. This review demonstrates the need for more targeted investigation into localisation methods in spinal surgery.
KW - Correct level
KW - Intraoperative localisation
KW - Marking
KW - Preoperative localisation
KW - Spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150775741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.09.003
M3 - Review Article
C2 - 36989767
AN - SCOPUS:85150775741
SN - 0967-5868
VL - 111
SP - 78
EP - 85
JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
ER -