The triumph of practical fairness over legitimate expectation in Australian administrative law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article explores the adoption and ultimate rejection in Australian administrative law of the idea of a legitimately held expectation as a basis for implying a duty of procedural fairness in administrative decision-making or fleshing out the content of that duty. The article analyses the peaks and troughs of the application of the concept of legitimate expectation, from its shaky beginnings and adoption, implementing UK law, to its subsequent demise and death in the High Court decision in the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (“WZARH”). Cases after WZARH are discussed and the new overall test of practical fairness in administrative decision-making is reviewed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)856-881
Number of pages26
JournalSingapore Academy of Law Journal
Volume29
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Cite this

@article{cc21619bbd5c46abaddf1e2bf3784357,
title = "The triumph of practical fairness over legitimate expectation in Australian administrative law",
abstract = "This article explores the adoption and ultimate rejection in Australian administrative law of the idea of a legitimately held expectation as a basis for implying a duty of procedural fairness in administrative decision-making or fleshing out the content of that duty. The article analyses the peaks and troughs of the application of the concept of legitimate expectation, from its shaky beginnings and adoption, implementing UK law, to its subsequent demise and death in the High Court decision in the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (“WZARH”). Cases after WZARH are discussed and the new overall test of practical fairness in administrative decision-making is reviewed.",
author = "Pittard, {Marilyn J}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "856--881",
journal = "Singapore Academy of Law Journal",
issn = "0218-2009",
publisher = "Singapore Academy of Law",

}

The triumph of practical fairness over legitimate expectation in Australian administrative law. / Pittard, Marilyn J.

In: Singapore Academy of Law Journal, Vol. 29, 03.2017, p. 856-881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The triumph of practical fairness over legitimate expectation in Australian administrative law

AU - Pittard, Marilyn J

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - This article explores the adoption and ultimate rejection in Australian administrative law of the idea of a legitimately held expectation as a basis for implying a duty of procedural fairness in administrative decision-making or fleshing out the content of that duty. The article analyses the peaks and troughs of the application of the concept of legitimate expectation, from its shaky beginnings and adoption, implementing UK law, to its subsequent demise and death in the High Court decision in the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (“WZARH”). Cases after WZARH are discussed and the new overall test of practical fairness in administrative decision-making is reviewed.

AB - This article explores the adoption and ultimate rejection in Australian administrative law of the idea of a legitimately held expectation as a basis for implying a duty of procedural fairness in administrative decision-making or fleshing out the content of that duty. The article analyses the peaks and troughs of the application of the concept of legitimate expectation, from its shaky beginnings and adoption, implementing UK law, to its subsequent demise and death in the High Court decision in the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (“WZARH”). Cases after WZARH are discussed and the new overall test of practical fairness in administrative decision-making is reviewed.

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 856

EP - 881

JO - Singapore Academy of Law Journal

JF - Singapore Academy of Law Journal

SN - 0218-2009

ER -