The scientific consensus on climate change: combating a two-decade campaign attacking

John Cook

doi:10.1051/epn/2013602

The scientific consensus on climate change: combating a two-decade campaign attacking

John Cook

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New research published this year found that among peer-reviewed climate papers stating a position on anthropogenic global warming, over 97% endorsed the scientific consensus that humans were causing climate change. Meanwhile, the public think there is a 50:50 debate among climate scientists. How did this "consensus gap" arise and can it be closed?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	29-32
Number of pages	4
Journal	Europhysics News
Volume	44
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2013602
Publication status	Published - Nov 2013
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1051/epn/2013602

Cite this

@article{bae66e6b7b5344978bb9511321ee4cf9,

title = "The scientific consensus on climate change: combating a two-decade campaign attacking",

abstract = "New research published this year found that among peer-reviewed climate papers stating a position on anthropogenic global warming, over 97% endorsed the scientific consensus that humans were causing climate change. Meanwhile, the public think there is a 50:50 debate among climate scientists. How did this {"}consensus gap{"} arise and can it be closed?",

author = "John Cook",

year = "2013",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1051/epn/2013602",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "29--32",

journal = "Europhysics News",

issn = "0531-7479",

publisher = "EDP Sciences",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scientific consensus on climate change

T2 - combating a two-decade campaign attacking

AU - Cook, John

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - New research published this year found that among peer-reviewed climate papers stating a position on anthropogenic global warming, over 97% endorsed the scientific consensus that humans were causing climate change. Meanwhile, the public think there is a 50:50 debate among climate scientists. How did this "consensus gap" arise and can it be closed?

AB - New research published this year found that among peer-reviewed climate papers stating a position on anthropogenic global warming, over 97% endorsed the scientific consensus that humans were causing climate change. Meanwhile, the public think there is a 50:50 debate among climate scientists. How did this "consensus gap" arise and can it be closed?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890385067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1051/epn/2013602

DO - 10.1051/epn/2013602

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84890385067

SN - 0531-7479

VL - 44

SP - 29

EP - 32

JO - Europhysics News

JF - Europhysics News

IS - 6

ER -

The scientific consensus on climate change: combating a two-decade campaign attacking

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this