The salvation of educational administration: better science or alternatives to science?

Peter Gronn; Peter Ribbins

doi:10.1177/174114329302100303

The salvation of educational administration: better science or alternatives to science?

Peter Gronn, Peter Ribbins

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peter Gronn is Senior Lecturer in the School of Graduate Studies in Monash University in Australia and Peter Ribbins is Reader in Educational Management in the School of Education of the University of Birmingham in England. In this paper they make six main criticisms of Evers and Lakomski's thesis in general and of its implications for their discussion of the work of Thomas Greenfield in particular Preface.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	161-169
Number of pages	9
Journal	Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Volume	21
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/174114329302100303
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 1993

Access to Document

10.1177/174114329302100303

Cite this

@article{7ae0b220ff0940d9aad1f197b2249e4d,

title = "The salvation of educational administration: better science or alternatives to science?",

abstract = "Peter Gronn is Senior Lecturer in the School of Graduate Studies in Monash University in Australia and Peter Ribbins is Reader in Educational Management in the School of Education of the University of Birmingham in England. In this paper they make six main criticisms of Evers and Lakomski's thesis in general and of its implications for their discussion of the work of Thomas Greenfield in particular Preface.",

author = "Peter Gronn and Peter Ribbins",

year = "1993",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/174114329302100303",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "161--169",

journal = "Educational Management Administration & Leadership",

issn = "1741-1432",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The salvation of educational administration

T2 - better science or alternatives to science?

AU - Gronn, Peter

AU - Ribbins, Peter

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - Peter Gronn is Senior Lecturer in the School of Graduate Studies in Monash University in Australia and Peter Ribbins is Reader in Educational Management in the School of Education of the University of Birmingham in England. In this paper they make six main criticisms of Evers and Lakomski's thesis in general and of its implications for their discussion of the work of Thomas Greenfield in particular Preface.

AB - Peter Gronn is Senior Lecturer in the School of Graduate Studies in Monash University in Australia and Peter Ribbins is Reader in Educational Management in the School of Education of the University of Birmingham in England. In this paper they make six main criticisms of Evers and Lakomski's thesis in general and of its implications for their discussion of the work of Thomas Greenfield in particular Preface.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973795654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/174114329302100303

DO - 10.1177/174114329302100303

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973795654

SN - 1741-1432

VL - 21

SP - 161

EP - 169

JO - Educational Management Administration & Leadership

JF - Educational Management Administration & Leadership

IS - 3

ER -

The salvation of educational administration: better science or alternatives to science?

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this