TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of active inference in conscious awareness
AU - Robinson, Jonathan Edward
AU - Corcoran, Andrew W.
AU - Whyte, Christopher J.
AU - Sárközy, András
AU - Seth, Anil K.
AU - Kovács, Gyula
AU - Friston, Karl J.
AU - Pennartz, Cyriel M.A.
AU - Tononi, Giulio
AU - Hohwy, Jakob
AU - Olcese, Umberto
AU - Boly, Melanie
AU - Yuste, Rafael
AU - Cavanagh, Patrick
AU - Tripathy, Srimant
AU - Peli, Eli
AU - Takahashi, Kengo
AU - Dorman, Reinder
AU - Petro, Lucy
AU - Abbatecola, Clement
AU - de la Cruz, Belen Montabes
AU - Monai, Elena
AU - Quero, Samuel Pontes
AU - Hart, Marius‘t
AU - Hwang, Daejoon
AU - Male, Shiva Ram
AU - Lee, Kwangjun
AU - Haun, Andrew
AU - Melloni, Lucia
AU - Tsuchiya, Nao
AU - Schiff, Nicholas
AU - Singer, Wolf
AU - Clark, Andy
AU - Bosman, Conrado
AU - Klink, Chris
AU - van Gaal, Simon
AU - TWCF: INTREPID Consortium
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Robinson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Active inference, a first-principles framework for modelling the behaviour of sentient agents, is beginning to be applied in consciousness research. One hypothesis arising from the framework is that active inference is necessary for changes in conscious content. As one component of an extensive adversarial collaboration among competing theories of consciousness, active inference will be contrasted with two other theories of consciousness, neither of which posit that active inference is necessary for consciousness. Here, we thus present a Study Protocol designed to test the active inference hypothesis using a carefully controlled adaptation of the motion-induced blindness paradigm, where an ‘active’ condition with richer active inference is contrasted with a ‘passive’ condition. In the active condition, participants direct their gaze towards a target stimulus following its disappearance from consciousness, and report on its subsequent reappearance. In the passive condition, participants maintain central fixation, while the stimulus array is moved across the visual field (in a replay of the active condition based on eye-tracking data acquired during active trials). In two experiments, we plan to investigate target reappearance across active and passive conditions to evaluate the contribution of active inference to conscious awareness. Results will eventually be considered in the context of all the experiments conducted as part of the overall adversarial collaboration.
AB - Active inference, a first-principles framework for modelling the behaviour of sentient agents, is beginning to be applied in consciousness research. One hypothesis arising from the framework is that active inference is necessary for changes in conscious content. As one component of an extensive adversarial collaboration among competing theories of consciousness, active inference will be contrasted with two other theories of consciousness, neither of which posit that active inference is necessary for consciousness. Here, we thus present a Study Protocol designed to test the active inference hypothesis using a carefully controlled adaptation of the motion-induced blindness paradigm, where an ‘active’ condition with richer active inference is contrasted with a ‘passive’ condition. In the active condition, participants direct their gaze towards a target stimulus following its disappearance from consciousness, and report on its subsequent reappearance. In the passive condition, participants maintain central fixation, while the stimulus array is moved across the visual field (in a replay of the active condition based on eye-tracking data acquired during active trials). In two experiments, we plan to investigate target reappearance across active and passive conditions to evaluate the contribution of active inference to conscious awareness. Results will eventually be considered in the context of all the experiments conducted as part of the overall adversarial collaboration.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023911882
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0328836
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0328836
M3 - Article
C2 - 41343515
AN - SCOPUS:105023911882
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 12
M1 - e0328836
ER -