Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The relationship between vertical stimulation and horizontal attentional asymmetries

  • Michael E.R. Nicholls
  • , Nicole A. Thomas
  • , Tobias Loetscher
  • , Sophie Wignall
  • , Mark J. Yates
  • , Jason D. Forte
  • , Charles J. Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The original aim was to examine the effect of perceived distance, induced by the Ponzo illusion, on left/right asymmetries for line bisection. In Experiment 1, university students (n = 29) made left/right bisection judgements for lines presented in the lower or upper half of the screen against backgrounds of the Ponzo stimuli, or a baseline. While the Ponzo illusion had relatively little effect on line bisection, elevation in the baseline condition had a strong effect, whereby the leftward bias was increased for upper lines. Experiment 2 (n = 17) eliminated the effect of elevation by presenting the line in the middle and moving the Ponzo stimuli relative to the line. Despite this change, the leftward bias was still stronger in the upper condition in the baseline condition. The final experiment (n = 17) investigated whether upper/lower visual stimulation, which was irrelevant to the task, affected asymmetries for line bisection. The results revealed that a rectangle presented in the upper half of the screen increased the leftward line bisection bias relative to a baseline and lower stimulation condition. These results corroborate neuroimaging research, showing increased right parietal activation associated with shifts of attention into the upper hemispace. This increased right parietal activation may increase the leftward attentional bias-resulting in a stronger leftward bias for line bisection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2384-2396
Number of pages13
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume65
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Line bisection
  • Neglect
  • Pseudoneglect

Cite this