The Punishments of the 1728 Musin Rebellion Leaders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The 1728 Musin Rebellion, an attempt to overthrow King Yŏngjo, erupted out of intense court factionalism. Over 1000 rebels were investigated and punished by Yŏngjo’s special tribunal. This article examines a hitherto neglected area: the punishments meted out to four of the most prominent leaders of the 1728 Musin Rebellion. Historians have focused on the causes of the rebellion rather than in its suppression, seeing rebellion as a thermometer of social problems. However, the diversity of rebel punishments requires some analysis: one was granted an “honorable” death, while another had his liver cut out and eaten, two received no trial and officials attempted to build a swamp to replace one rebel’s home. An analysis of official trial records as well as private, legal, and cultural histories show that the court’s punishments were initially motivated by strategic needs to destroy the rebel challenge. In addition, officials saw punishment as an extension of factional conflict, a course Yŏngjo was keen to discourage and he used punishments as a tool to solidify his political domination and pacify the post-rebellion court.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-144
Number of pages25
JournalKorean Studies
Volume43
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • 1728 Musin Rebellion,
  • factionalism
  • King Yŏngjo
  • Chosŏn dynasty

Cite this

@article{7369facc35ad46bbb406f8a46c3e8da3,
title = "The Punishments of the 1728 Musin Rebellion Leaders",
abstract = "The 1728 Musin Rebellion, an attempt to overthrow King Yŏngjo, erupted out of intense court factionalism. Over 1000 rebels were investigated and punished by Yŏngjo’s special tribunal. This article examines a hitherto neglected area: the punishments meted out to four of the most prominent leaders of the 1728 Musin Rebellion. Historians have focused on the causes of the rebellion rather than in its suppression, seeing rebellion as a thermometer of social problems. However, the diversity of rebel punishments requires some analysis: one was granted an “honorable” death, while another had his liver cut out and eaten, two received no trial and officials attempted to build a swamp to replace one rebel’s home. An analysis of official trial records as well as private, legal, and cultural histories show that the court’s punishments were initially motivated by strategic needs to destroy the rebel challenge. In addition, officials saw punishment as an extension of factional conflict, a course Yŏngjo was keen to discourage and he used punishments as a tool to solidify his political domination and pacify the post-rebellion court.",
keywords = "1728 Musin Rebellion,, factionalism, King Yŏngjo, Chosŏn dynasty",
author = "Jackson, {Andrew David}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1353/ks.2018.0011",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "120--144",
journal = "Korean Studies",
issn = "0145-840X",
publisher = "University of Hawai‘i Press",

}

The Punishments of the 1728 Musin Rebellion Leaders. / Jackson, Andrew David.

In: Korean Studies, Vol. 43, 2019, p. 120-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Punishments of the 1728 Musin Rebellion Leaders

AU - Jackson, Andrew David

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The 1728 Musin Rebellion, an attempt to overthrow King Yŏngjo, erupted out of intense court factionalism. Over 1000 rebels were investigated and punished by Yŏngjo’s special tribunal. This article examines a hitherto neglected area: the punishments meted out to four of the most prominent leaders of the 1728 Musin Rebellion. Historians have focused on the causes of the rebellion rather than in its suppression, seeing rebellion as a thermometer of social problems. However, the diversity of rebel punishments requires some analysis: one was granted an “honorable” death, while another had his liver cut out and eaten, two received no trial and officials attempted to build a swamp to replace one rebel’s home. An analysis of official trial records as well as private, legal, and cultural histories show that the court’s punishments were initially motivated by strategic needs to destroy the rebel challenge. In addition, officials saw punishment as an extension of factional conflict, a course Yŏngjo was keen to discourage and he used punishments as a tool to solidify his political domination and pacify the post-rebellion court.

AB - The 1728 Musin Rebellion, an attempt to overthrow King Yŏngjo, erupted out of intense court factionalism. Over 1000 rebels were investigated and punished by Yŏngjo’s special tribunal. This article examines a hitherto neglected area: the punishments meted out to four of the most prominent leaders of the 1728 Musin Rebellion. Historians have focused on the causes of the rebellion rather than in its suppression, seeing rebellion as a thermometer of social problems. However, the diversity of rebel punishments requires some analysis: one was granted an “honorable” death, while another had his liver cut out and eaten, two received no trial and officials attempted to build a swamp to replace one rebel’s home. An analysis of official trial records as well as private, legal, and cultural histories show that the court’s punishments were initially motivated by strategic needs to destroy the rebel challenge. In addition, officials saw punishment as an extension of factional conflict, a course Yŏngjo was keen to discourage and he used punishments as a tool to solidify his political domination and pacify the post-rebellion court.

KW - 1728 Musin Rebellion,

KW - factionalism

KW - King Yŏngjo

KW - Chosŏn dynasty

U2 - 10.1353/ks.2018.0011

DO - 10.1353/ks.2018.0011

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 120

EP - 144

JO - Korean Studies

JF - Korean Studies

SN - 0145-840X

ER -