The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) tool predicts reduction in sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Athina Liacos, Christine F. McDonald, Ajay Mahal, Catherine J. Hill, Annemarie L. Lee, Angela T. Burge, Rosemary Moore, Caroline Nicolson, Paul O'Halloran, Narelle S. Cox, Aroub Lahham, Rebecca Gillies, Anne E. Holland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the predictive validity, minimal important difference (MID) and responsiveness of the PRAISE tool. Design: Retrospective data analysis from HomeBase trial of home vs centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Setting: Tertiary health service. Participants: One hundred and sixty-six participants with COPD (100 men) with mean age 69 (SD 9) years, FEV 1 % predicted 50% (19). Interventions: Eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program, conducted at the hospital or at home. Main outcome measures: The 15-item PRAISE tool comprising 10 general and five pulmonary rehabilitation-specific self-efficacy questions. Predictive validity was examined by exploring the relationship between baseline PRAISE score and objective change in physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation using the SenseWear Armband. The MID was evaluated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Responsiveness was assessed with effect sizes. Results: A higher baseline PRAISE score (indicating better self-efficacy) was an independent predictor of reduced sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation (P = 0.03). A one point increase in PRAISE was associated with a decrease in sedentary time of 4 minutes/day (95% confidence interval −7.8 to −0.4 minutes/day). Anchor-based estimates of the MID were 0.5 to 1.5 points; however sensitivity and specificity were modest (area under the curve <0.70). Change in PRAISE score following pulmonary rehabilitation had an effect size of 0.21. Conclusions: The PRAISE tool has predictive validity and may be useful to identify those with high self-efficacy who are more likely to achieve important health behaviour changes with pulmonary rehabilitation. The small effect size suggests that the PRAISE tool was not responsive to changes following pulmonary rehabilitation. Trial registration number: NCT01423227, clinicaltrials.gov.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-97
Number of pages8
JournalPhysiotherapy
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health behaviour
  • Physical activity
  • Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive
  • Self-efficacy

Cite this

@article{8d2fd9523acf466b821fefccecb1ce69,
title = "The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) tool predicts reduction in sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine the predictive validity, minimal important difference (MID) and responsiveness of the PRAISE tool. Design: Retrospective data analysis from HomeBase trial of home vs centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Setting: Tertiary health service. Participants: One hundred and sixty-six participants with COPD (100 men) with mean age 69 (SD 9) years, FEV 1 {\%} predicted 50{\%} (19). Interventions: Eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program, conducted at the hospital or at home. Main outcome measures: The 15-item PRAISE tool comprising 10 general and five pulmonary rehabilitation-specific self-efficacy questions. Predictive validity was examined by exploring the relationship between baseline PRAISE score and objective change in physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation using the SenseWear Armband. The MID was evaluated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Responsiveness was assessed with effect sizes. Results: A higher baseline PRAISE score (indicating better self-efficacy) was an independent predictor of reduced sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation (P = 0.03). A one point increase in PRAISE was associated with a decrease in sedentary time of 4 minutes/day (95{\%} confidence interval −7.8 to −0.4 minutes/day). Anchor-based estimates of the MID were 0.5 to 1.5 points; however sensitivity and specificity were modest (area under the curve <0.70). Change in PRAISE score following pulmonary rehabilitation had an effect size of 0.21. Conclusions: The PRAISE tool has predictive validity and may be useful to identify those with high self-efficacy who are more likely to achieve important health behaviour changes with pulmonary rehabilitation. The small effect size suggests that the PRAISE tool was not responsive to changes following pulmonary rehabilitation. Trial registration number: NCT01423227, clinicaltrials.gov.",
keywords = "Health behaviour, Physical activity, Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive, Self-efficacy",
author = "Athina Liacos and McDonald, {Christine F.} and Ajay Mahal and Hill, {Catherine J.} and Lee, {Annemarie L.} and Burge, {Angela T.} and Rosemary Moore and Caroline Nicolson and Paul O'Halloran and Cox, {Narelle S.} and Aroub Lahham and Rebecca Gillies and Holland, {Anne E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.009",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "90--97",
journal = "Physiotherapy",
issn = "0031-9406",
number = "1",

}

The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) tool predicts reduction in sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). / Liacos, Athina; McDonald, Christine F.; Mahal, Ajay; Hill, Catherine J.; Lee, Annemarie L.; Burge, Angela T.; Moore, Rosemary; Nicolson, Caroline; O'Halloran, Paul; Cox, Narelle S.; Lahham, Aroub; Gillies, Rebecca; Holland, Anne E.

In: Physiotherapy, Vol. 105, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 90-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) tool predicts reduction in sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

AU - Liacos, Athina

AU - McDonald, Christine F.

AU - Mahal, Ajay

AU - Hill, Catherine J.

AU - Lee, Annemarie L.

AU - Burge, Angela T.

AU - Moore, Rosemary

AU - Nicolson, Caroline

AU - O'Halloran, Paul

AU - Cox, Narelle S.

AU - Lahham, Aroub

AU - Gillies, Rebecca

AU - Holland, Anne E.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Objectives: To examine the predictive validity, minimal important difference (MID) and responsiveness of the PRAISE tool. Design: Retrospective data analysis from HomeBase trial of home vs centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Setting: Tertiary health service. Participants: One hundred and sixty-six participants with COPD (100 men) with mean age 69 (SD 9) years, FEV 1 % predicted 50% (19). Interventions: Eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program, conducted at the hospital or at home. Main outcome measures: The 15-item PRAISE tool comprising 10 general and five pulmonary rehabilitation-specific self-efficacy questions. Predictive validity was examined by exploring the relationship between baseline PRAISE score and objective change in physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation using the SenseWear Armband. The MID was evaluated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Responsiveness was assessed with effect sizes. Results: A higher baseline PRAISE score (indicating better self-efficacy) was an independent predictor of reduced sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation (P = 0.03). A one point increase in PRAISE was associated with a decrease in sedentary time of 4 minutes/day (95% confidence interval −7.8 to −0.4 minutes/day). Anchor-based estimates of the MID were 0.5 to 1.5 points; however sensitivity and specificity were modest (area under the curve <0.70). Change in PRAISE score following pulmonary rehabilitation had an effect size of 0.21. Conclusions: The PRAISE tool has predictive validity and may be useful to identify those with high self-efficacy who are more likely to achieve important health behaviour changes with pulmonary rehabilitation. The small effect size suggests that the PRAISE tool was not responsive to changes following pulmonary rehabilitation. Trial registration number: NCT01423227, clinicaltrials.gov.

AB - Objectives: To examine the predictive validity, minimal important difference (MID) and responsiveness of the PRAISE tool. Design: Retrospective data analysis from HomeBase trial of home vs centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Setting: Tertiary health service. Participants: One hundred and sixty-six participants with COPD (100 men) with mean age 69 (SD 9) years, FEV 1 % predicted 50% (19). Interventions: Eight-week pulmonary rehabilitation program, conducted at the hospital or at home. Main outcome measures: The 15-item PRAISE tool comprising 10 general and five pulmonary rehabilitation-specific self-efficacy questions. Predictive validity was examined by exploring the relationship between baseline PRAISE score and objective change in physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation using the SenseWear Armband. The MID was evaluated using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Responsiveness was assessed with effect sizes. Results: A higher baseline PRAISE score (indicating better self-efficacy) was an independent predictor of reduced sedentary time following pulmonary rehabilitation (P = 0.03). A one point increase in PRAISE was associated with a decrease in sedentary time of 4 minutes/day (95% confidence interval −7.8 to −0.4 minutes/day). Anchor-based estimates of the MID were 0.5 to 1.5 points; however sensitivity and specificity were modest (area under the curve <0.70). Change in PRAISE score following pulmonary rehabilitation had an effect size of 0.21. Conclusions: The PRAISE tool has predictive validity and may be useful to identify those with high self-efficacy who are more likely to achieve important health behaviour changes with pulmonary rehabilitation. The small effect size suggests that the PRAISE tool was not responsive to changes following pulmonary rehabilitation. Trial registration number: NCT01423227, clinicaltrials.gov.

KW - Health behaviour

KW - Physical activity

KW - Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive

KW - Self-efficacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054454640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 30316548

AN - SCOPUS:85054454640

VL - 105

SP - 90

EP - 97

JO - Physiotherapy

JF - Physiotherapy

SN - 0031-9406

IS - 1

ER -