The Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-Analyses

Nikolaos Kazantzis, Hoang Kim Luong, Alexsandra S. Usatoff, Tara Impala, Rui Ying Yew, Stefan G Hofmann

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) refers to a treatment approach with strong empirical support for its efficacy for various disorders and populations. The goal of the present review was to provide a comprehensive survey of meta-analyses examining the processes of CBT, namely: treatment processes (cognitive reappraisal, behavioral strategies, emotional regulation, motivation strategies, and psychoeducation) and in-session processes (alliance, goal consensus and collaboration, feedback, group cohesion, and homework). We identified 558 meta-analyses of CBT, and 30 meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria as reviews of process-outcome relations. For treatment processes, the strongest support currently exists for cognitive (n = 8 meta-analyses) and behavioral strategies (n = 3 meta-analyses) as change processes in CBT for anxiety disorders and depression. For in-session processes, the strongest support currently exists for the role of the alliance (n = 8 meta-analyses) and homework assignments (n = 6 meta-analyses) as predictors of outcome. Overall, the evidence base for process-outcome relations in CBT is just emerging. Additional research is needed to examine the range of treatment processes in various clinical contexts. Moreover, except for a meta-analysis on collaboration, no meta-analytic studies have been reported on CBT-specific elements of the therapeutic relationship, such as collaborative empiricism and Socratic dialogue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-357
Number of pages9
JournalCognitive Therapy and Research
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • cognitive behavioral therapy
  • process
  • review

Cite this

Kazantzis, Nikolaos ; Luong, Hoang Kim ; Usatoff, Alexsandra S. ; Impala, Tara ; Yew, Rui Ying ; Hofmann, Stefan G. / The Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy : A Review of Meta-Analyses. In: Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2018 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 349-357.
@article{8edade8c6d7946abbc574145665c2038,
title = "The Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-Analyses",
abstract = "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) refers to a treatment approach with strong empirical support for its efficacy for various disorders and populations. The goal of the present review was to provide a comprehensive survey of meta-analyses examining the processes of CBT, namely: treatment processes (cognitive reappraisal, behavioral strategies, emotional regulation, motivation strategies, and psychoeducation) and in-session processes (alliance, goal consensus and collaboration, feedback, group cohesion, and homework). We identified 558 meta-analyses of CBT, and 30 meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria as reviews of process-outcome relations. For treatment processes, the strongest support currently exists for cognitive (n = 8 meta-analyses) and behavioral strategies (n = 3 meta-analyses) as change processes in CBT for anxiety disorders and depression. For in-session processes, the strongest support currently exists for the role of the alliance (n = 8 meta-analyses) and homework assignments (n = 6 meta-analyses) as predictors of outcome. Overall, the evidence base for process-outcome relations in CBT is just emerging. Additional research is needed to examine the range of treatment processes in various clinical contexts. Moreover, except for a meta-analysis on collaboration, no meta-analytic studies have been reported on CBT-specific elements of the therapeutic relationship, such as collaborative empiricism and Socratic dialogue.",
keywords = "cognitive behavioral therapy, process, review",
author = "Nikolaos Kazantzis and Luong, {Hoang Kim} and Usatoff, {Alexsandra S.} and Tara Impala and Yew, {Rui Ying} and Hofmann, {Stefan G}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s10608-018-9920-y",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "349--357",
journal = "Cognitive Therapy and Research",
issn = "0147-5916",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

The Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy : A Review of Meta-Analyses. / Kazantzis, Nikolaos; Luong, Hoang Kim; Usatoff, Alexsandra S.; Impala, Tara; Yew, Rui Ying; Hofmann, Stefan G.

In: Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 42, No. 4, 08.2018, p. 349-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

T2 - A Review of Meta-Analyses

AU - Kazantzis, Nikolaos

AU - Luong, Hoang Kim

AU - Usatoff, Alexsandra S.

AU - Impala, Tara

AU - Yew, Rui Ying

AU - Hofmann, Stefan G

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) refers to a treatment approach with strong empirical support for its efficacy for various disorders and populations. The goal of the present review was to provide a comprehensive survey of meta-analyses examining the processes of CBT, namely: treatment processes (cognitive reappraisal, behavioral strategies, emotional regulation, motivation strategies, and psychoeducation) and in-session processes (alliance, goal consensus and collaboration, feedback, group cohesion, and homework). We identified 558 meta-analyses of CBT, and 30 meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria as reviews of process-outcome relations. For treatment processes, the strongest support currently exists for cognitive (n = 8 meta-analyses) and behavioral strategies (n = 3 meta-analyses) as change processes in CBT for anxiety disorders and depression. For in-session processes, the strongest support currently exists for the role of the alliance (n = 8 meta-analyses) and homework assignments (n = 6 meta-analyses) as predictors of outcome. Overall, the evidence base for process-outcome relations in CBT is just emerging. Additional research is needed to examine the range of treatment processes in various clinical contexts. Moreover, except for a meta-analysis on collaboration, no meta-analytic studies have been reported on CBT-specific elements of the therapeutic relationship, such as collaborative empiricism and Socratic dialogue.

AB - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) refers to a treatment approach with strong empirical support for its efficacy for various disorders and populations. The goal of the present review was to provide a comprehensive survey of meta-analyses examining the processes of CBT, namely: treatment processes (cognitive reappraisal, behavioral strategies, emotional regulation, motivation strategies, and psychoeducation) and in-session processes (alliance, goal consensus and collaboration, feedback, group cohesion, and homework). We identified 558 meta-analyses of CBT, and 30 meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria as reviews of process-outcome relations. For treatment processes, the strongest support currently exists for cognitive (n = 8 meta-analyses) and behavioral strategies (n = 3 meta-analyses) as change processes in CBT for anxiety disorders and depression. For in-session processes, the strongest support currently exists for the role of the alliance (n = 8 meta-analyses) and homework assignments (n = 6 meta-analyses) as predictors of outcome. Overall, the evidence base for process-outcome relations in CBT is just emerging. Additional research is needed to examine the range of treatment processes in various clinical contexts. Moreover, except for a meta-analysis on collaboration, no meta-analytic studies have been reported on CBT-specific elements of the therapeutic relationship, such as collaborative empiricism and Socratic dialogue.

KW - cognitive behavioral therapy

KW - process

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046907662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10608-018-9920-y

DO - 10.1007/s10608-018-9920-y

M3 - Review Article

VL - 42

SP - 349

EP - 357

JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research

JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research

SN - 0147-5916

IS - 4

ER -