From the comparative framework of writing on the meaning of ritual in the field of the history of religions (M. Eliade and J. Z. Smith), this essay argues that one of the major problems in Benjamin s thinking is how to make certain forms of materiality stand out against other (degraded) forms. In his early work, the way that Benjamin deals with this problem is to call degraded forms symbolic , and those forms of materiality with positive value, allegorical . The article shows how there is more than an incidental connection with the recent approach to ritual in the field of history of religions, seeing that Benjamin too wants to set out the significance of certain material forms against those that are ritualistic and hence false. It is argued that he treats the latter in his essay on Elective Affinities and the former in his Trauerspiel. The key claim is that the way material forms stand out as meaningful is akin to the Kantian description of the aesthetic attitude, which identifies how certain formations warrant and attract reflective attention and underpin (the) moral orientation. The point is significant since Kantian aesthetics is an object of polemical attention across Benjamin s heterogeneous corpus. Moreover, the approach shows the main difficulty in Benjamin s treatment of sensible forms: what are the criteria he uses to distinguish the bad way a sensible form has of being meaningful from the good ?