TY - JOUR
T1 - The prevalence and management of deteriorating patients in an Australian emergency department
AU - Connell, Clifford J.
AU - Endacott, Ruth
AU - Cooper, Simon
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Complex human and system factors impact the effectiveness of Rapid Response Systems (RRS). Emergency Department (ED) specific RRS are relatively new and the factors associated with their effectiveness are largely unknown. This study describes the period prevalence of deterioration and characteristics of care for deteriorating patients in an Australia ED and examine relationships between system factors and escalation of care. Methods: A retrospective medical record audit of all patients presenting to an Australian ED in two weeks. Results: Period prevalence of deterioration was 10.08% (n = 269). Failure to escalate care occurred in nearly half (n = 52, 47.3%) of the patients requiring a response (n = 110). Appropriate escalation practices were associated with where the patient was being cared for (p = 0.01), and the competence level of the person documenting deterioration (p = 0.005). Intermediate competence level nurses were nine times more likely to escalate care than novices and experts (p = 0.005). While there was variance in escalation practice related to system factors, these associations were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The safety of deteriorating ED patients may be improved by informing care based on the escalation practices of staff with intermediate ED experience and competence levels.
AB - Background: Complex human and system factors impact the effectiveness of Rapid Response Systems (RRS). Emergency Department (ED) specific RRS are relatively new and the factors associated with their effectiveness are largely unknown. This study describes the period prevalence of deterioration and characteristics of care for deteriorating patients in an Australia ED and examine relationships between system factors and escalation of care. Methods: A retrospective medical record audit of all patients presenting to an Australian ED in two weeks. Results: Period prevalence of deterioration was 10.08% (n = 269). Failure to escalate care occurred in nearly half (n = 52, 47.3%) of the patients requiring a response (n = 110). Appropriate escalation practices were associated with where the patient was being cared for (p = 0.01), and the competence level of the person documenting deterioration (p = 0.005). Intermediate competence level nurses were nine times more likely to escalate care than novices and experts (p = 0.005). While there was variance in escalation practice related to system factors, these associations were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The safety of deteriorating ED patients may be improved by informing care based on the escalation practices of staff with intermediate ED experience and competence levels.
KW - Clinical deterioration
KW - Emergency care
KW - Emergency department
KW - Patient safety
KW - Rapid response systems
KW - Track & trigger
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090481530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.auec.2020.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.auec.2020.07.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 32917577
AN - SCOPUS:85090481530
VL - 24
SP - 112
EP - 120
JO - Australasian Emergency Care
JF - Australasian Emergency Care
SN - 2588-994X
IS - 2
ER -