Abstract
Siegfried Kracauer's reading of the work of R.G. Collingwood illuminates the crisis point in the relation between philosophy, history and how the present is thought. In this paper I argue that Kracauer's dismissal of Collingwood illuminates a misunderstanding of the latter's philosophical project, and takes no account of a certain affinity between the two thinkers. Collingwood not only shared Kracauer's view that a philosophically oriented historical investigation of the past might offer some hope for the present, but also had a fuller grasp of the philosophical implications of the ambivalent relation between historical time and the present than Kracauer gave him credit for.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 338-357 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Critical Horizons |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- History
- Philosophy
- Present
- Kracauer
- Collingwood
- Orpheus