The potential cost effectiveness of pharmacist delivered brief intervention for alcohol misuse

Hector Jose Navarro, Anthony Shakeshaft, Christopher M Doran, Dennis J Petrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The provision of brief intervention (BI) for alcohol misuse in community pharmacies appears to be feasible,although little has been done in determining its impact. This research aims to model pharmacists’ delivered screening, BI and costs per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption relative to current practice in rural Australia. A decision model was developed to assess costs and changes in outcomes from pharmacist-delivered screening and BI on alcohol consumption in 10 rural communities in New South Wales, Australia. Nine different scenarios were utilised to test the robustness of results to variations in key parameters. Based on evidence from current practice, approximately 22% of all risky drinkers in a defined community would reduce alcohol consumption annually, of which about 0.02% would do so because of pharmacist-delivered screening and BI and 1% would do so because of pharmacist screening only. Realistic increments of 10% and 20% in pharmacist-delivered screening and BI would reduce the proportion of risky drinkers by 0.5% and 1.6% at a cost of AUD$50 and AUD$40 respectively,per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that increments in pharmacist delivered screening and BI rates may result in potential cost-effective reductions in alcohol consumption, although its widespread adoption is unlikely to occur because almost all risky drinking pharmacy customers would need to be screened to achieve a reasonable effect size.
Original languageEnglish
Article number173
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of General Practice
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brief intervention
  • Alcohol misuse
  • Pharmacist
  • Risky drinker
  • Cost-effectiveness

Cite this

@article{c7151f909d474b0ea5c6c49989be99d5,
title = "The potential cost effectiveness of pharmacist delivered brief intervention for alcohol misuse",
abstract = "The provision of brief intervention (BI) for alcohol misuse in community pharmacies appears to be feasible,although little has been done in determining its impact. This research aims to model pharmacists’ delivered screening, BI and costs per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption relative to current practice in rural Australia. A decision model was developed to assess costs and changes in outcomes from pharmacist-delivered screening and BI on alcohol consumption in 10 rural communities in New South Wales, Australia. Nine different scenarios were utilised to test the robustness of results to variations in key parameters. Based on evidence from current practice, approximately 22{\%} of all risky drinkers in a defined community would reduce alcohol consumption annually, of which about 0.02{\%} would do so because of pharmacist-delivered screening and BI and 1{\%} would do so because of pharmacist screening only. Realistic increments of 10{\%} and 20{\%} in pharmacist-delivered screening and BI would reduce the proportion of risky drinkers by 0.5{\%} and 1.6{\%} at a cost of AUD$50 and AUD$40 respectively,per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that increments in pharmacist delivered screening and BI rates may result in potential cost-effective reductions in alcohol consumption, although its widespread adoption is unlikely to occur because almost all risky drinking pharmacy customers would need to be screened to achieve a reasonable effect size.",
keywords = "Brief intervention, Alcohol misuse, Pharmacist, Risky drinker, Cost-effectiveness",
author = "Navarro, {Hector Jose} and Anthony Shakeshaft and Doran, {Christopher M} and Petrie, {Dennis J}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.4172/2329-9126.1000173",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
journal = "Journal of General Practice",
issn = "2329-9126",
publisher = "OMICS Publishing Group",

}

The potential cost effectiveness of pharmacist delivered brief intervention for alcohol misuse. / Navarro, Hector Jose; Shakeshaft, Anthony; Doran, Christopher M; Petrie, Dennis J.

In: Journal of General Practice, Vol. 2, 173, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The potential cost effectiveness of pharmacist delivered brief intervention for alcohol misuse

AU - Navarro, Hector Jose

AU - Shakeshaft, Anthony

AU - Doran, Christopher M

AU - Petrie, Dennis J

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The provision of brief intervention (BI) for alcohol misuse in community pharmacies appears to be feasible,although little has been done in determining its impact. This research aims to model pharmacists’ delivered screening, BI and costs per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption relative to current practice in rural Australia. A decision model was developed to assess costs and changes in outcomes from pharmacist-delivered screening and BI on alcohol consumption in 10 rural communities in New South Wales, Australia. Nine different scenarios were utilised to test the robustness of results to variations in key parameters. Based on evidence from current practice, approximately 22% of all risky drinkers in a defined community would reduce alcohol consumption annually, of which about 0.02% would do so because of pharmacist-delivered screening and BI and 1% would do so because of pharmacist screening only. Realistic increments of 10% and 20% in pharmacist-delivered screening and BI would reduce the proportion of risky drinkers by 0.5% and 1.6% at a cost of AUD$50 and AUD$40 respectively,per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that increments in pharmacist delivered screening and BI rates may result in potential cost-effective reductions in alcohol consumption, although its widespread adoption is unlikely to occur because almost all risky drinking pharmacy customers would need to be screened to achieve a reasonable effect size.

AB - The provision of brief intervention (BI) for alcohol misuse in community pharmacies appears to be feasible,although little has been done in determining its impact. This research aims to model pharmacists’ delivered screening, BI and costs per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption relative to current practice in rural Australia. A decision model was developed to assess costs and changes in outcomes from pharmacist-delivered screening and BI on alcohol consumption in 10 rural communities in New South Wales, Australia. Nine different scenarios were utilised to test the robustness of results to variations in key parameters. Based on evidence from current practice, approximately 22% of all risky drinkers in a defined community would reduce alcohol consumption annually, of which about 0.02% would do so because of pharmacist-delivered screening and BI and 1% would do so because of pharmacist screening only. Realistic increments of 10% and 20% in pharmacist-delivered screening and BI would reduce the proportion of risky drinkers by 0.5% and 1.6% at a cost of AUD$50 and AUD$40 respectively,per additional risky drinker reducing alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that increments in pharmacist delivered screening and BI rates may result in potential cost-effective reductions in alcohol consumption, although its widespread adoption is unlikely to occur because almost all risky drinking pharmacy customers would need to be screened to achieve a reasonable effect size.

KW - Brief intervention

KW - Alcohol misuse

KW - Pharmacist

KW - Risky drinker

KW - Cost-effectiveness

U2 - 10.4172/2329-9126.1000173

DO - 10.4172/2329-9126.1000173

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - Journal of General Practice

JF - Journal of General Practice

SN - 2329-9126

M1 - 173

ER -