The politics of counting and reporting conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence

the case of Myanmar

Sara Davies, Jacqui True

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars, states and international organizations have begun to systematically count, document and compare sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in conflict-affected countries. Qualitative and quantitative studies point to a “tip of the iceberg” phenomenon, where there is a high prevalence but low level of actual reporting of SGBV. We investigate the conditions in which SGBV is reported or, more significantly, is not reported to discover the trends of reporting in politically oppressive environments where SGBV is thought to be occurring. We ask how the power to report in local conflict-affected areas is affected by national political tensions and pervasive gender discrimination. Reporting of SGBV in Myanmar, a country that has experienced multiple, protracted conflicts since independence, is examined. Analysis of open-access reports over a fifteen-year period reveals a pattern of silence that we argue is rooted in pervasive discriminatory civil and physical practices against women. Engaging with the deeply politicized and gender discriminatory context of conflict-affected societies enables us to see the anomalies of SGBV data and to highlight significant gaps in our knowledge about SGBV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-21
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Feminist Journal of Politics
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence
  • ethnic conflict
  • feminist methodology
  • human rights reporting
  • Myanmar

Cite this

@article{08b1791a8c2b496a94a6ce766f59f77d,
title = "The politics of counting and reporting conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence: the case of Myanmar",
abstract = "Scholars, states and international organizations have begun to systematically count, document and compare sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in conflict-affected countries. Qualitative and quantitative studies point to a “tip of the iceberg” phenomenon, where there is a high prevalence but low level of actual reporting of SGBV. We investigate the conditions in which SGBV is reported or, more significantly, is not reported to discover the trends of reporting in politically oppressive environments where SGBV is thought to be occurring. We ask how the power to report in local conflict-affected areas is affected by national political tensions and pervasive gender discrimination. Reporting of SGBV in Myanmar, a country that has experienced multiple, protracted conflicts since independence, is examined. Analysis of open-access reports over a fifteen-year period reveals a pattern of silence that we argue is rooted in pervasive discriminatory civil and physical practices against women. Engaging with the deeply politicized and gender discriminatory context of conflict-affected societies enables us to see the anomalies of SGBV data and to highlight significant gaps in our knowledge about SGBV.",
keywords = "Conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence, ethnic conflict, feminist methodology, human rights reporting, Myanmar",
author = "Sara Davies and Jacqui True",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14616742.2017.1282321",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "4--21",
journal = "International Feminist Journal of Politics",
issn = "1461-6742",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

The politics of counting and reporting conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence : the case of Myanmar. / Davies, Sara; True, Jacqui.

In: International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 4-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The politics of counting and reporting conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence

T2 - the case of Myanmar

AU - Davies, Sara

AU - True, Jacqui

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - Scholars, states and international organizations have begun to systematically count, document and compare sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in conflict-affected countries. Qualitative and quantitative studies point to a “tip of the iceberg” phenomenon, where there is a high prevalence but low level of actual reporting of SGBV. We investigate the conditions in which SGBV is reported or, more significantly, is not reported to discover the trends of reporting in politically oppressive environments where SGBV is thought to be occurring. We ask how the power to report in local conflict-affected areas is affected by national political tensions and pervasive gender discrimination. Reporting of SGBV in Myanmar, a country that has experienced multiple, protracted conflicts since independence, is examined. Analysis of open-access reports over a fifteen-year period reveals a pattern of silence that we argue is rooted in pervasive discriminatory civil and physical practices against women. Engaging with the deeply politicized and gender discriminatory context of conflict-affected societies enables us to see the anomalies of SGBV data and to highlight significant gaps in our knowledge about SGBV.

AB - Scholars, states and international organizations have begun to systematically count, document and compare sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in conflict-affected countries. Qualitative and quantitative studies point to a “tip of the iceberg” phenomenon, where there is a high prevalence but low level of actual reporting of SGBV. We investigate the conditions in which SGBV is reported or, more significantly, is not reported to discover the trends of reporting in politically oppressive environments where SGBV is thought to be occurring. We ask how the power to report in local conflict-affected areas is affected by national political tensions and pervasive gender discrimination. Reporting of SGBV in Myanmar, a country that has experienced multiple, protracted conflicts since independence, is examined. Analysis of open-access reports over a fifteen-year period reveals a pattern of silence that we argue is rooted in pervasive discriminatory civil and physical practices against women. Engaging with the deeply politicized and gender discriminatory context of conflict-affected societies enables us to see the anomalies of SGBV data and to highlight significant gaps in our knowledge about SGBV.

KW - Conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence

KW - ethnic conflict

KW - feminist methodology

KW - human rights reporting

KW - Myanmar

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017275318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14616742.2017.1282321

DO - 10.1080/14616742.2017.1282321

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 4

EP - 21

JO - International Feminist Journal of Politics

JF - International Feminist Journal of Politics

SN - 1461-6742

IS - 1

ER -