TY - JOUR
T1 - The physical education predisposition scale
T2 - preliminary tests of reliability and validity in Australian students
AU - Hilland, Toni A.
AU - Brown, Trent D.
AU - Fairclough, Stuart J.
PY - 2018/2/16
Y1 - 2018/2/16
N2 - The main aim of this study was to psychometrically test the Physical Education Predisposition Scale (PEPS) with a cohort of Australian students, to assess secondary school students’ perceived PE ability and PE worth. Secondary aims were to explore how the two variables were related and to investigate age and gender differences. Altogether, 266 Year 7, 8, 9 and 10 students (aged 12–16 years), from four schools within the South Eastern region of Melbourne, completed the PEPS at both time points. Principal components analysis revealed the presence of a simple two-factor structure explaining 66.9% of the variance. Factor 1 (labelled perceived PE worth) reflected enjoyment and attitude (α =.91), and factor 2 (labelled perceived PE ability) represented perceptions of competence and self-efficacy (α =.92). Significant positive correlations were observed between the two factors (r =.50–.82, P <.001). Boys scored significantly higher than girls on perceived PE ability (P =.01), and year 7 students scored significantly higher compared to Year 9 students (P =.002). Our results support the potential of the PEPS as a concise measurement tool for use in the PE setting, for both teachers and researchers.
AB - The main aim of this study was to psychometrically test the Physical Education Predisposition Scale (PEPS) with a cohort of Australian students, to assess secondary school students’ perceived PE ability and PE worth. Secondary aims were to explore how the two variables were related and to investigate age and gender differences. Altogether, 266 Year 7, 8, 9 and 10 students (aged 12–16 years), from four schools within the South Eastern region of Melbourne, completed the PEPS at both time points. Principal components analysis revealed the presence of a simple two-factor structure explaining 66.9% of the variance. Factor 1 (labelled perceived PE worth) reflected enjoyment and attitude (α =.91), and factor 2 (labelled perceived PE ability) represented perceptions of competence and self-efficacy (α =.92). Significant positive correlations were observed between the two factors (r =.50–.82, P <.001). Boys scored significantly higher than girls on perceived PE ability (P =.01), and year 7 students scored significantly higher compared to Year 9 students (P =.002). Our results support the potential of the PEPS as a concise measurement tool for use in the PE setting, for both teachers and researchers.
KW - perceived ability
KW - perceived worth
KW - physical education
KW - Reliability
KW - validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016490585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2017.1308002
DO - 10.1080/02640414.2017.1308002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85016490585
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 36
SP - 384
EP - 392
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 4
ER -